- Tuesday, 10 November 2009
- INQ Mobile
- RSS
It's not the taste of water I object to. It's the after effects - Ronald Knox
US and Japan want China to ease up on protectionism
US AND Japanese trade negotiators have been asking the Chinese to scrap rules on foreign computers and stop being so protective of its industry during the global slowdown.
Toshihiro Nikai, Japan's trade minister, and US Trade Representative Ron Kirk told AP, China should drop plans to require certification of IT products to be used by the government.
The Chinese want to look under the bonnet of any IT products that foreigners want to flog in China in case it has anything nasty stowed away there. Besides the US and Japan are the last people who should moan about protectionism.
The US claims the Chinese just want to nick whatever technology they can get their hands on. µ
Share this:
ShareBusiness Intelligence Software
Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
Enterprise Accounting Software
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
Enterprise Systems Management
There's a bit of mental weakness in the argument that the US ought to be the last country to complain about Chinese protectionism. While significantly far from a truly open economy, it still has one of the most open economies in the world. And you can concretely measure the effect of this in its still enormous long-standing trade deficit.
"US and Japan" are plural, so you is expected to use the plural for the verb... isn't you?
Sorry, me english poorr....
The twenty first century belongs only to China. China will take whatever it wants.
ya'll listen up
ya'll better start learning how to
read, write and speak chinese, rap in chinese, order food in chinese, be chinese
chinese dollar chin chin, bling bling
ka peace~~~
IMHO all this crysis true reason is USA-china economic dependency, so caled Chimerica, and this crysis only end,- then this is over: $ devalvates, or juan revalvates, or whole world will go from global economics to regional ones, USA, 16 years, from clinton or even GWB (the first) are rising their debt, and now they are rising even at much greater speed, if they can`t spend less past 16 years or more, could they do it, in the future,- having much bigger debt, bigger procents to pay ? Ye they can print more $, but it`s tempruary solution, till some limit
and for china, the sky is not clear too, china is bigest winner of global economics and if something changes ... could they move there titanic to adobt to the new situation.