The Inquirer-Home

Kaspersky puts the willies up the web

Infosec 2009 Let's get together
Fri May 01 2009, 14:04

LAST YEAR, Eugene Kaspersky CEO of Russia’s Anti-Virus company Kaspersky labs was to be guest speaker at the Infosec IT security show in London. He didn't make it

Luckily Kespersky made it into town for this year's show and sat down with the INQ to bemoan the state of  Internet security.

Kaspersky highlighted what a state the world’s Internet is in, how unsecure the Internet really is, what can really be done to make it secure, along with who needs to get the ball rolling and how long it will take.

KasperskyHe reckons cyber-terrorists are all too confident today, also the police aren’t as effective as they could be, seeing there are no borders to the online worlds.  This makes it difficult to know how widespread these cyber terrorists really are across the multiple regions they reign in.

There is so much red tape in the way today between country to country he said, it’s very difficult to police these different regions all together.

He also believes the financial crises we are in will stimulate criminailty even more and with the global economy depending on the Internet, everyone’s at risk. Stark words indeed.

Kaspersky says all these networks were insecure from the start, due to the very nature of how they were established, from the days of ARPA way back when, with academics and the military thought to be the only ones using it. Eugene thinks this is the one of the underlying faults, which is a very big part of the problem and needs to change.

He said it’s now become very serious, with major businesses connected to the network and how vulnerable they really are – all of which has been seen in recent attacks.

The likes of Conficker, with over 10 million botnet attacks finally made governments pay attention.  It was a very well-orchestrated organised attack.  Kaspersky  said this made governments finally realise there’s a problem, with network security and what they need to do to address it.

He believes they now need to take control of the Internet no more so than right now.  He aired some ideas from the likes of Internet passports for users, a possible Internet Interpol organisation needing to be in place to take control.

This is his major idea which he was currently airing to all those that would take notice. It’s something he has been talking about for the last six or seven years.

Apparently, governments have now taken notice, although the implementation of this he believes will take another 10 to 20 years. In the government’s eye, that time period isn’t all that long, with all the bureaucracy a large movement will entail.     

Kaspersky sees his role as an advisor on this movement, that’s all. No credit to be taken in his name, only to help from the insight he has gained in all his years as a security consultant on this very matter. This makes perfect sense. Who else would you want to back a major change and aid than someone who deals with this day in, day out along with being irked by the problems too along with being able to test out these practices.

He does believe any new measures will never be 100 per cent secure, but it’ll be a start in the right direction. They will stop most, but there will always be some people professional enough to bypass these regulations and reek havoc. His main goal is to protect against the 1000s of criminals, not the 100s.

Governments need to put these measures in place he firmly believes, but first of all they need to start talking to each other – which has always been in the past a major problem. Without these organisations sitting down and starting to air their differences, seeing what the common problems are there is no way any type of resolutions will be on the cards any time soon.

Kaspersky thought perhaps the likes of the United Nations could get involved. Although it might take another attack as large and as potentially damaging as Conficker, to make them all finally start to get the ball rolling or at least make a firm move in the right direction.

Another factor he believes which could deter cyber criminals is a higher risk of arrest. The possibility of a larger sentence or greater monetary fine could be imposed, as a result of their activities.  

Possible accreditations for businesses and organisations, network providers and ISPs, with the likes of logging some basic data on activity to help the police if they called could help on this fight Eugene believes.  

There has been a move to begin the Internet Interpol, which has been aired and discussed at the recent Convention of Cyber Crime, stated Kaspersky. Organisations like IMPACT have started very projects that look very much like this and how it could proceed.

The more recent move for ISPs to hold data on user’s online activity is one move to design a more secure internet, the UK has started this just as the Netherlands have all with much controversy attached.

Kaspersky has already spoken to some people in influence to start all these practices along with the procedures of designing a more secure internet. He mentioned a few Lords in the Houses of Parliament, people in the European Parliament and The Unites States government – all of which agreed the problem was serious.

In closing, he said a rather insightful and home-hitting truism: "Humans are humans, they won’t make a move until there’s a serious incident"

Think of all the large disasters in human history and the preventions that are in place after they happened. Something needs to happen now, before it’s all too late and it’s just an afterthought rather than a preventive measure for next time. µ

Share this:

Comments
Kap is whipping boy for Govt Tax thiefs.

Govt's are struggling to find ways to tax the internet, govt's always tax stuff as much as they can so their mates can get richer and the ministers can get kickbacks etc.

Kap is just giving them ammo to think of a way to tax it. The "internet police" will need funding, so we will "need" an internet tax fund.

Internet Restructuring will need funding, so there will need to be a tax for this also.

posted by : interested_party, 04 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Hardware and software vendors, too:

Sony execs should be doing hard time for their company's CD root-kit exploits.
M$ should be held responsible for their pushing vulnerable technologies onto an unsophisticated public.

posted by : Carlie J. Coats,Jr., 04 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Internet passports?

I don't think they will label their ID:
"I am a terrorist please block me"

Passports for communicating on the internet and know who you talk to or who sent you an email then I am all for it.
(I know it's possible but since there isn't an easy ID in place that has to be used it won't be used) it would also help against SPAM.

posted by : Kedas, 04 May 2009 Complain about this comment
@Marco

Marco,

Tavarischi is plural meaning friends or comrads.
Tavarisch is singular.
Just so you know.

THE Eno Master

posted by : Eno Master, 04 May 2009 Complain about this comment
I don't trust KAV..

..not any more, it took them WEEKS to even just DETECT the notorious Conficker/downadup.b virus (from LiveCD).
they are either incompetent or part of some kind of conspiracy.
why isn't anyone calling it 'Kido', eh?

posted by : Tom Jones, 04 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Fox ISP ??

True there are some who would operate the internet as a postal service for email and television for the WWW. Both are huge fails and should never be allowed to happen. If it does get rammed down our throats, look for a whole bunch of private hobby sub nets to pop up. Create a whole new separate private membership only internet. Not such a bad idea.

Anarchy and Chaos is the only true freedom.

posted by : righteous indignation, 02 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Spellchecker:1, Proofreading:0

Having a spell checker is always good. But knowing how to properly proofread an article: priceless.

It’s one thing to mis-spell an obscure word that is being used for style over substance. It’s another thing to have mis-uses of words alongside abysmal sentence structure and a chaotically organized article.

Case in point: “reek havoc” (14th paragraph). Reek? You mean havoc stinks?? It has a pong, an odour, a stench?

A better word to use would have been wreak, which means to implement, to bring about; cause.

posted by : René Kabis, 02 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Look at me , I'm a Billy G. wanna be !

This "tavarischi" (comrade) , thinks he knows what's best for me .
So did the party back in its day and the long list of "I know what's best for you"
sons of Russia .
Citizen "K" :You will never be Billy G. nor K. labs Micro$.

posted by : Marco, 02 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Hey Buddy, How 'bout Some Security for Freedom?

Internet passports. How wonderful! We've seen what happens in the US over the last 8 years when citizens give up their freedom for PERCEIVED security.

Of course, Mr. Kaspersky hails from the "Land O'Stalin" ™ and is a security vendor to boot. Are we to suppose that he has no more an agenda than the safety and security of its netizens?

Shurely shome mistake.

posted by : Raymond Cranfill, 01 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Who's Kidding Who ...... Change is Always Revolutionary in Binary?

The following Postscripts in a Submission received by Microsoft's Project Huron, would Posit that the Present Status Quo Establishment* are nowhere near Smart enough to make any Worthwhile Change, by Reason of their Corrupted, Self Serving Natures, and thus will Vulnerabilities be QuITe Naturally Probed and Ruthlessly Exploited.

PS. Happy May Day .... which is just A.N.Other Heavenly ZerodDay Trading Opportunity for Some who may be Many. :-)

PPS The Hotmail portal does Provide a very Convenient Audio Visual IM Service which would Appears to Terrify Traditional Government and Governance Practitioners with its Transparency and Immediacy, and Perceived Lack of Security and it is hard not to conclude that that would be because they would have so much to hide in that which they would be sharing amongst themselves, for Perverse Maintenance of their own Personal Advantage rather than General Distribution of Greater Benefit. And thus would their Service be an Abject, and even Criminal Failure, which One would not Wish to Continue, Hidden from View..... which would be another Future Development to be Considered for Greater Peer Pressure Review Change ..... for Universal Control of Systems.

* Quite who they would imagine themselves to be is something which is really of relative insignificance nowadays should they be unable share their Needs, Transparently over the Web for ITs Immediate Impact Facility.

posted by : amanfromMars, 01 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Coming Down Hard

All this talk of regulation may sound nice, but coming from a country with a repressive government, I'm pissin' scared that any for mof regulation in "freer" countries will be a justification for tighter regulations on internet censorship where I come from, to "protect" us.

cheers

posted by : oster, 01 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Something smells...

"reek havoc" ??? Try "wreak havoc" perhaps.

posted by : A Pedant, 01 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Cyber terrorism should be handled by InterPol.

InterPol should be the cops to be involved with Cyber terrorism. They should be dealt with a UN based tribunal. Then stop giving them time off to help catch other criminals. Solitary confinement as a minimum for 5 years.

posted by : Glenn, 01 May 2009 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?