Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Number of child abuse web sites falls

Still a cause for concern, says IWF
Wednesday, 29 April 2009, 11:44

THE UK'S self-regulatory watchdog, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) has released an annual report for 2008 in which it claims the number of websites containing child sexual abuse content has dropped by almost 10 per cent, but warns the public not to slip into complacency.

The IWF - which objects to the term "child pornography" as sexual acts on a child constitute abuse rather than the consent implied by the term "pornography" - reckons 74 per cent of child sexual abuse domains traced are commercial operations which sickeningly make money from selling obscene pictures of children.

According to the organisation's report, 75 per cent of these commercial sites (approximately 850 unique domains by the IWF's count) are registered with just 10 domain name registries. This, says the organisation, highlights the importance of adding to already concerted international efforts which hope to pressure the offending domain name registries to de-list any offending sites.

“These web sites, although reducing in number, represent an extremely serious problem," said IWF Chief Executive, Peter Robbins, adding: “The extensive intelligence networks we have with partner hotlines and law enforcement colleagues around the world to support international action are making a real difference but the sophisticated way these web sites operate still makes it a highly complex and global challenge.”

The IWF, which draws funding both from the Internet industry and the EU, runs a UK hotline for the public to call in and report any criminal Internet content. The organisation then proceeds to immediately send out a take-down notice to firms offering web hosting services in the UK. IWF claims to have dealt with over 200,000 hotline tipoffs since 1996 and - in partnership with UK police forces - issued 59 take-down notices for potentially illegal content to British ISPs in 2008 alone. That illegal content, says the IWF, is removed within hours by the UK Internet industry.

Disturbingly, IWF's report notes that 58 per cent of child sexual abuse domains traced include vile and graphic images involving penetration or torture, up from 47 per cent the year before. The organisation also says 69 per cent of the children featured on the domains traced appear to be under 10 years old, with 24 per cent aged just six and under and four per cent aged just two or under. IWF does say, however, that it is extremely rare for sites with child sexual abuse content to be traced back to hosts in the UK, finding just under one per cent.

Britain's Minister for Communications, Technology and Broadcasting, Lord Stephen Carter said he continued to be, "impressed by the breadth of its [IWF's] industry support and by the range of UK industry-led tactics to combat child sexual abuse content online". He added that effective and widely supported self-regulation was, "not a simple formula", requiring IWF's, "commitment to a range of stakeholder demands, public interest concerns, international political pressures, and technological evolution.”

According to the report, the biggest challenge faced by child sex abuse campaigners was the "global nature" of online distribution, something which could only be tackled with better public/private partnerships with ISPs worldwide, national notice and take-down schemes, promotion of filtering services to prevent accidental access to child sex abuse websites, partnerships with domain name registries to delist domain names in violation of the law and cross border data sharing. µ

Share this:

Comments
Accidentally

"promotion of filtering services to prevent accidental access to child sex abuse websites"

How does one accidentally access a child abuse site?
I do not pretend to be a saint, and I am no hypocrite. I visit sites that make goatse.cx look like softcore, yet I have yet to see ONE picture of a child being abused.
One does not accidentally stumble upon a child abuse website. Arguments like this in favor of filtering make the idea even more suspicious.

I applaud the efforts of the IWF to clean the internet of stuff that is really sick, but they are walking a very fine line. I do not want "freedom of speech" on the list of collateral damage victims in this crusade.

posted by : Deimios, 29 April 2009 Complain about this comment
Re: Accidentally

Wasn't there a story a while ago about a lawyer (or politician?) in New York state that got the ISP"s to stop access to ALL newsgroups because child porn was being passed through newsgroups.It looks like our freedom of speech has already been affected. I hope that they can get rid of this sick trash but there has to be a better way than censorship.

posted by : doc2or, 29 April 2009 Complain about this comment
Children Are Scape Goats of People....

Staturoty Law Protects Home & Family To Point AnyOne Can Be Kill just By Being There. However, Same Festering Enviorments harbours Some Very UnSavory Schemes, Nowadays. In Public Health, there are specific laws to allow dystruction of UnWanted Children. Its Commonly done, NO Questions Asked. SQUASH, Next.

age Months to 7 Years Prime Target, Before Know What To Do & NoBody Really Knows Them, Ethier. When Finished, Turn Person Over to Social Services & Walla, NEXT.

Vulgaria is Prime source for photos, Mostly from Wentzstein of china. AKA Mr. Smith in Rural Areas. EveryOne Dies In Rube, Except Perpetrators Whom Put On Invisible Show, One That Cann't Be Tracked Back & Found. TS Drashek

posted by : ProNogRaPhor, 29 April 2009 Complain about this comment
Does Abuse Stop at Age?

When will people realize that discrimination by classifying abuse by age, is stumbling the issue[s]!

Most of the time in courts age is set as a line not to be crossed, it look commendable, but since abuse is abuse, age has become a rite of passage for ABUSERS, after she's or he's 18 or whatever I'll get what I want thing!

I KNOW it's because of the economic ties to the porn industry and advertising that this is occurring.

So who is going to be first to be REALLY SERIOUS about this!?

posted by : Phil, 29 April 2009 Complain about this comment
russian mafia

"According to the organisation's report, 75 per cent of these commercial sites (approximately 850 unique domains by the IWF's count) are registered with just 10 domain name registries."

This goes on because the servers are run by the russian mafia. It makes tons of money off kiddy porn. It pays off the very corrupt Russian government so they never get shut down.

posted by : grandman, 01 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Windows 7 impressions

How is windows 7 working out for you?