Gays banned from being Jedis

No it's just a pretty grrl

Jedis, weren't they into celibacy, like another large religion that has hung around a millenia or 2 ?
Could not have the same issues with the staff getting... urges, shorely.

or did everyone read that as Bloware.

no

Would it be too hard to make an 18+ discussion subforum for topics like this?
Then the community would be appeased and Bioware would not be in the crosshairs of the gay/lesbian/bi rights groups.
Bioware usually was at the forefront of the gay/lesbian movement by depicting gay,lesbian,group and interracial relations.
I hope that it's just one overzealous forum admin doing what he thought appropriate and we will not have such constraints in future Bioware titles.
I for one actually enjoyed trying all possibilities in Jade Empire.

No-one goes to the toilet in Star Wars, either. Close all toilet-related threads at once!

Your answer to a multi-choice question was "no" - classic! :c)

Why should discussion of Homosexuality be put into a 18+? Would the same rules apply for straight relationships? Its stuff like that which promotes that gays are different from straights.

that's all

Luke never showed any interest in women. Homo!

Deimios-
Er! They are different.
Myself.I've always had the urge to go in by the front door.
Tradesmen, please use the back door only.

I have to admit,I did slip up & accidentally slide in the back door once,but she never complained,lol.

Luke Was Princess' Brother & Capt. Ford Married Princess At End. Sounds Like Ordinary Barker Gang Sling.

Now to turn things around, its LG, obvious connection of letters. If Princess Had Cell phone, Galactic System Could of Saved Some Monies & Fuel.

Was Death Star Really Steam Room? How Did Chwie Know Codes & Live In Trees? ALL These Questions & More must Be Answered Before Virgin RIP. Remember ANOS has One Purpose: iB M. Its' Health Issue, Astrological Issue & Religious Curiosity.STeWie drashek

Yes any sexually themed discussion (regardless of orientation) should be done in an 18+ subforum. I do not say that it's a solution that I like, but it is a compromise that both parties can agree on.
I say that we need an option to allow people to filter it out themselves. Some people don't like reading about sexual orientation on a forum? Simple, don't go to the 18+ one. NOT ban/close any discussion about the subject, or if you do ban then don't discriminate.

The major 2 religions of the world being the most homophobic, it is desirable to avoid being a target of their attention. That and the shouting mob of mothers who instead of parenting try to destroy anything that doesn't fit their fluffy pink worldview in the name of protecting the children.

In one line:
Don't give in, but don't provoke either.

Of course he did.

Luke got kissed by Leia in SW:ESB and he deffinatly had a chuffed look on his face.

Anyway it's possible that Poofs are from Earth only; With a dispraportionate amount in the SE of England.

Seriously, is that the goal of every agenda pushing gay rights movement is to say that the best set of movies ever was full of quieres?

Honestly, the can take a P!$$ off break and if they want quieres in movies just have them watch brokeback mountain movie over and over on the loop.

I have no prob with quieres but i have an issue with all agenda pushing types str8 or gay.

The issue was "As I have stated before, these are terms that do not exist in Star Wars."

So you can't say "lesbian" or "homosexual." That's cool.

Just call them men who like to have sexual relationships with men or women who like to have sexual relationships with women.

Problem solved. No offensive^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H non-existent words required.

being forced to kiss your sister doesn't make you exactly straight either...

besides, you sound soo unnecessarily geek recalling all that data...

Are Jedi into bondage? Who cares! Why does the homosexual agenda have to be brought up in every facet of our life. Keep your sex life in the closet. I don't care if you're gay, into S&M or whatever, it doesn't need to be public knowlege.

Whether referring to gays or straights, there's more to sexual orientation than sex; the American Psychological Association defines it as an individual's sense of "personal and social identity based on those attractions, behaviors expressing them, and membership in a community of others who share them."

None of this is 18+ content, and censoring it in any way (even your suggestion of restricting it to adult audiences) is yet another way of marginalizing gay identity and continuing the belief that there should be different treatment of gays as there is to straights.

If sexual acts (regardless of sexual orientation) were discussed, that would be inappropriate. Otherwise, there's no need to censor people on a large part of their identity. Even worse, bowing to *anticipated* backlash from "the major 2 religions of the world ... to avoid being a target of their attention" is never the answer to preventing such discrimination.

We must remember that our rights stop where another person's begins. Meaning, people who create the games have the right to do and say as they please in the situation. This is why TOS (terms of service) are crated in the first place.

when did tech news turn into gay news?
And has technology turned gay or is everyone in I.T just gay?
omg gay overload.....