- Wednesday, 11 November 2009
- INQ Mobile
- RSS
Intergrerty -- we've never heard of it - Doc Spinola of that ilk
Open saucers plan legal attack on patent office
Nibble
Penguins of a feather
Friday, 27 March 2009, 11:20
LEGAL EAGLES working for Open Sauce collectives have discovered that there is a cheap way of fighting concerns about patent liability.
Van Lindberg, an attorney with Haynes and Boone, who spoke at Infoworld's Open Source Business Conference in San Francisco, said that more outfits should be asking the US Patent & Trademark Office to re-examine patents that may pose a threat to them.
He said that this is a cheaper, sometimes more suitable alternative to waging a patent lawsuit.
Some Open Source groups are successfully using this method. µ
L'Inq
PC World
Share this:
Share
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
INQ Whitepapers
Business Intelligence Software
Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
Enterprise Accounting Software
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
Enterprise Systems Management
Jobs
Advertisement
INQ Poll
To make such an attack, a vendor would be inviting triple dmages if the patent is held valid.
They're asking the patent office to review - nothing to do with the patent holder.
A request for re-exam is not an attack "on" the patent office.
It is an attack i in /i the patent office, i through /i the patent office, i on /i some company's patent.
Why would anyone waste time "attacking" the government? What would they hope to achieve?
"Why would anyone waste time "attacking" the government? What would they hope to achieve?"
-That's exactly what I told the crowd back in Paris on july 14th 1789.