Qualcomm accused of unfair trade

This convinces me that all this "anti-competitive" crap is just to extract money from companies doing well.

"The KFTC is miffed at the way Qualcomm sets prices and integrates multimedia technology into its chipsets, which are used in mobile phones which it says is anti-competetive."

What should they do then? Start selling each chip separately? Isn't a company even given a right to decide what form their products are to take? And why don't KTFC and EU sue Apple? Just because it doesn't have the majority of market share? Why just sue MS and Intel? Is it a crime to succeed? Why always favor the underdog? If some company succeeds by doing well, they deserve to keep that success unless the competitors do better.

I work for a small-medium sized company and some of our products are directly competing with a very big company. The big company is privately owned and cash rich. While we are publicly owned (by shareholders). Even though our products are better by design, what the big company is able to do is undermine their profit by selling at a loss. This can sway customers to buy their products, while we cannot do the same without shareholders asking a lot of questions. Luckily we work very closely with customers, but if this happens a lot, we will not be able to sell enough to remain afloat. Flattening the little guy over time while the big company has lots of cash reserve to weather it. Anti-competitive? I think so.

meh