The Inquirer-Home

Cray uses Supermicro blades for CX1

CeBit 2009 Deskbottom supercomputer
Tue Mar 10 2009, 16:33

YOU MAY HAVE heard about the Cray CX1, a 'desktop cluster' in the vein of the Tyan Typhoon. They are interesting little beasts, and with the addition of Nehalems, now have the grunt to be a deskbottom supercomputer.

Cray_lx1

The front of the beastlet

The CX1 isn't a breakthrough in technology by any means, it is just a product to fill a niche. The machine itself has eight blades that will each take two Nehalem EPs, and a claimed 32G of RAM/blade. We won't bring up that Nehalems use ram in 6G increments, if you can count to 32 evenly in sixes, you are using a different base than most people.

In addition to Nehalems, you can opt for a storage blade, normally you only get two drives per blade or a GPGPU blade. Out the back, there is Infiniband or Ethernet, take your pick. That said, the cable routing could use a little cleaning up...

Lx1_rear

Back of the beastlet

Cray probably doesn't want you to know that the blades are in fact Supermicro blades, so you could probably get away with a little less cost should you shop around. That said, the version you see above, with four Harpertown x 2 blades, a GPGPU blade and active noise cancellation is available online for about $30K.

It may be a little while to Christmas, but what tot wouldn't be delighted to see one of these under the tree? µ

 

Share this:

Comments
Counting to 30

xorsprite: 6x3=18, 4x3=12, 18+12=30

posted by : Spinfusor, 11 March 2009 Complain about this comment
Counting to 32

6G + 6G + 6G + 4G + 4G + 4G = 32G

posted by : xorsprite, 11 March 2009 Complain about this comment
Nice Case

Can you get the case on its own?

posted by : Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 10 March 2009 Complain about this comment
Nehalemator

Uh, last I heard, Nehalem takes either 2-way or 3-way interleaves, which means the server instances - probably due to cost - use 2-way configuarations

posted by : BoboJones, 10 March 2009 Complain about this comment
Bases

A radix-22/3 numbering system (or in general, a (6 * x + 4)/3 base system) can express "32" as an integer multiple of "6". But yes, if you constrain yourself to integer numbering systems, "32" is never a multiple of "6".

posted by : Cynic, 10 March 2009 Complain about this comment
Oh the humanity!

Not only that. I also think there's no base in which 32 is divisible evenly by 6, because then 3(2y-x)=2 would have a solution in integer (x,y).

Seriously, I lament the decline in journalistic standards.

posted by : S2, 10 March 2009 Complain about this comment
GPGPU?! You mean CUDA!

Let's be honest here. The only GPGPU available for the CX1 is Nvidia Tesla, your beloved one!
Come on Charlie, it's not that difficult...
N V I D I A T E S L A!

posted by : Titius, 10 March 2009 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?