The Inquirer-Home

Unshackled EMI man says fight against file sharing is useless

New business model needed
Fri Feb 13 2009, 02:55

AS AN EMPLOYEE OF GLOBAL MUSIC GIANT EMI Per Erik Johansen felt the need to toe the company line when it came to the prickly subject of file sharing and illegal downloads.

At one time during his tenure as an EMI director, he was the target of a major backlash against the company which was at the forefront of an ill-fated attempt to infect retail music CDs with draconian copy protection.

Emi

When, in 2004, five thousand people lobbied EMI to remove the annoying DRM from CDs they had purchased in good faith, and were not able to back up in accordance with fair usage laws, Johansen was quoted as saying, "I have neither the desire nor the ability to give out discs without copy protection," insisting that, of the 400,000 hobbled CDs sold, only 28 people had complained.

Now freed from the corporate shackles, Johansen is far more pragmatic about the way the music industry should be working.

Speaking to Swedish mag Dagbladet (one of our favourites and always a fixture in trap two of the bogs at INQ Towers) he says he now believes that files sharing does not amount to theft and thinks that the ongoing fight against piracy is useless.

"There is a reason why we have copyright, and I agree", he says. "But the main thing is that a whole generation already violates copyright, and the only thing we can do now is find better solutions."

And he feels that generating income from live performances and tapping into other revenue streams is essntial to the future of the music industry. "I am extremely optimistic. There has been a revolution, and in the wake of this, it is very chaotic. Today there is an entrepreneurial spirit that is both healthy and exciting. We do not know how the industry will look in a year or two, but I am convinced that the future looks promising."

And as the former EMI company man now runs his own record label, he is in a great position to change the workings of the machine from within. But it's his attitude to a changing world that is most refreshing, an attitude from which the like of the RIAA could learn a valuable lesson:

"No one has ever won a battle when fighting against new technology," he said, and we are inclined to agree. µ

L'Inq
Dagnabbit

Share this:

Comments
Main news tonight: recording industry man states bleedin' obvious

You know it's Friday 13th when a record exec speaks common-bloody sense that has been iterated so many times over the last 5 years you'd given up hope of *anyone* in that industry accepting it.

Best batten down the hatches, the end of the world is nigh!

posted by : Dave, 13 February 2009 Complain about this comment
Dagbladet is not Swedish

Sorry dagbladet (and the domain .no) is Norwegian, not Swedish.

Altough Norway should be a colony of Sweden, that is not the fact ;)

posted by : Seb, 13 February 2009 Complain about this comment
Mr

Time for record industry to turn back to having purely concerts...

posted by : mike, 14 February 2009 Complain about this comment
And that's why...

...record companies now have '360' deals with artists, where they get a cut of the proceeds from concerts. That's where the real money is, with cds being more of a promotion. And since the companies now have a stake in the concerts they have more of an incentive to promote the concerts.

Now if they can only stop nickel-and-diming the artists so they aren't in the hole after cutting a record...

posted by : Selvy, 14 February 2009 Complain about this comment
Concert NOW, CD's MP3 Later?

It looks like this is what is coming. New artist productions will be put in concert tours first, for a whole duration of milking, then after it will be available in other formats? Yeeah, I could live with that.

Just a question, are they going to attempt to tag a fee on the ticket price when you bring in your personal Digital gear at the concert?

posted by : Phil, 15 February 2009 Complain about this comment
rebirth of live music?

That the record industry should try to raise revenue from live music is interesting in view of its responsibility for the virtual destruction of live music in the first place.

posted by : stolennomenclature, 16 February 2009 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Digital Economy Bill

Is the Digital Economy Bill a good thing?