Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Phoenix goes into virtual hyperspace

Nice idea, high cost
Monday, 19 January 2009, 09:18

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES IS TRYING to get into the consumer hypervisor market with a new entry called Hyperspace. It looks quite promising, but there are a few cautionary notes to keep in mind before you dive in.

The idea is simple, when you press the power button, it wakes up the laptop into a VM with Linux running a stripped down set of services to get you on the net very quickly. It is aimed at the non-technical user, so everything is icon based and simple. The very nature that allows it to boot quickly also gives it the ability to run on very light-duty netbooks.

Phoenix_hyperspace
Phoenix Hyperspace

There are two versions one that allows for essentially dual booting, and the bigger brother that lets you run both it and Windows side by side. Each variant is a separate product, so pick one or the other. Actually, the hardware OEM will probably do that for you, Hyperspace will probably just come bundled with your next notebook.

On the up side, it boots really quickly, in seconds. When we say boots, that means fully up in Firefox and able to surf, not the way MS plays with the terms. Sitting with the desktop initially drawn and everything frozen while several GB of TSRs load and services crawl to life is not fully booted.

Even if you have time to boot the machine, if you only want to surf, Phoenix claims Hyperspace will add 20-30 per cent to your battery life. They don't need to run all the useless Windows background tasks and DRM, so it works much more efficiently. What's not to like?

The way it functions is simple, instead of going to full sleep or hibernation, Hyperspace adds a mode called hot sleep. This puts most things to sleep like you normally would, but keeps some critical circuits awake to boot and access the net in much less time. This means no re-negotiation when you press the power button, and everything works quickly. You pay the price in a little more power used, but that is tolerable, especially if it is plugged in.

There are some down sides, and most of them are financial. The first one is there is an app store. This may sound good, but to us, that says things are going to be closed down, and you will get nickel and dimed to death. Let's hope we am wrong here, but since it is not working yet, only time will tell.

Price is also the thing that will keep me away from Hyperspace. It is nice, but Phoenix is going to charge $40 for the dual boot version, and $60 for the side by side variant. If this seems reasonable, that is a per year subscription. They will target OEMs, so you basically buy the laptop and get a year free, or worse yet, you get the 'full version, worth $500 for a 90 day trial' when you buy.

For the money they are charging, we don't think Hyperspace will take off, much less fly. Consumers tend to hate this kind of thing, and if it comes with the laptop, fine, but it's doubtful many people will renew when things expire. I wouldn't.

Hyperspace is a good idea, but has two severe limitations. The price, and the fact that it will only work with Windows. The target audience is moving past malware-infested platforms and subscriptions, so why aim there? Both problems are solvable, and if Phoenix does solve them, Hyperspace could be a good thing. If not, some competitor will slot in the gap, and the consumer will win either way. µ

 

Share this:

Comments
AT LAST!

The long wait is over.... we've got an unbiased and fairly objective piece of work! </sarcasm

"....several GB of TSRs load and services crawl to life...." Yeah, right, machines with 1 physical gig + 1 swap gig can undoubtely load SEVERAL gigs of stuff into memory. Besides, TSRs (AFAIK) died with MS-DOS.

".... They don't need to run all the useless Windows background tasks and DRM, so it works much more efficiently."
Again... yeah, right. Everything in Windows is useless and DRM-related...

.... where did I hear that the press was supposed to be neutral and unbiased?

posted by : zio, 19 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Limited utility, and risks

The virtualised "hybrid" version (the one that doesn't dual-boot, and the only one I'd bother considering) has a number of issues:

1. It's not just Windows-only, it's Vista-only. To be exact, Vista SP-1 32-bit English, and nothing else. If you've upgraded* your Vista licence to XP, you can't use it;

2. The list of approved target machines is pretty limited. Eight, to be exact. If you're not using a tested machine, beware!;

3. Information from user forums suggests that there are many problems, particularly on non-tested platforms. Bear in mind that if it goes wrong, you may well have lost your original operating system, and all the data associated with it. Even if you haven't, restoring the system to a workable state may require expert help and additional software;

4. I put in an FAQ request a while ago, asking whether it's possible to use VMWare or VirtualBox when booted from HyperSpace Hybrid. Phoenix has been silent on this question, and I have grave doubts that it would be possible to do so, at least at any reasonable speed;

5. A number of users appear to have had problems uninstalling HyperSpace.

It seems like a useful product, but I can't help but think it's been released too early.

Jon
(* Better performance, better compatibility with pre-existing applications and hardware ... how's it not an upgrade?)

posted by : Jon Green, 19 January 2009 Complain about this comment
@Zio

Come on zio, we are all used to switching on a pc, logging on to Windows, and then waiting as the icon's in the taskbar slowly fill up. As each icon is loading it's software and doing it's thing, this takes time. We are used to seeing the mouse as an hourglass, this can take a few minutes.

The really annoying thing I find is that there is no program which is in charge of all of this that displays in a simple GUI what is happening and if it's necessary and switch-off-able.

So much crap software is allowed to do what it wants in windows, it's definitely not for the customer's benefit. I would like more GUI control of this. This would be easy to do, if Microsoft were a customer focused company.

RE: the nice new easy-quick-start laptop/pc OS. Nice idea, shame it's so expensive.

I wonder will Windows 7 give us a fast-start stripped-down user-selectable dual/triple/quad boot mode? Not likely, which is a shame.

posted by : interested_party, 19 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?