Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Phenom II X4 940 vs. the QX 9770 vs. the Core i7 965

Hardware Windup Battle of the Titans
Wednesday, 17 December 2008, 10:45

THE UNQUESTIONABLE scoop of the day is at OCW. The site has a comparison review of the Phenom II X4 940 vs. the QX 9770 vs. the Core i7 940. The tests show the Phenom II to be very competent and, above all, it doesn't break the bank. In most games it'll equal the Core i7 940, but trail the QX 9770. Overclocking is also very good, as you can get some good overclocks (~800MHz) on air with this Phenom II. Considering it costs half of what costs the i7 and a quarter of a QX 9770, things might be looking up for AMD... we can 'ardly wait for those DDR3 versions of the Phenom II.

Click here.

Eliot at Fudzilla dropped us a line, we didn't pick up on their coverage of the Kuma processor, (nor did our spy network find the Tom's Hardware and EOC articles on the same matter). Although the processor is kicking the E7200 in its value groin, it'll become an expensive trade-off in the end, as the processor sucks a lot of power, adding to your electricity bill. Still, ‘tis the last of the 65nm processors...

Fudzilla

Tom's Hardware

Extreme Overclocking

Gskill, the enthusiast memory brand, is having its DDR3 tri-channel kit benched at Guru of 3D. This PC3-12800 memory is very much like one that A-Data announced just the other day, it also sports a very good price tag for 6 gigs-worth of DDR3. Read the review. Must say, someone's got very sharp photography skills over there at Guru.

TweakToon is testing a 1200W Ikonik Vulcan PSU. It's built to bear pretty much anything out there - tri-SLI, peltier cooling, etc... - it costs a stack of bills, but if you want 1200W that's the price to pay. Find the review, here.

Hot Hardware is delving into a bit of the pro hardware by taking on the Quadro FX 4800. It's a difficult business, this judging of pro graphics, but there are FireStream numbers on hand for a fair comparison. Performance is way up on "bang for buck" as the card launches cheaper than its FX 5600 brother and delivers more. If you're of the pro inclination, go here.

Still talking about professional computing, Anandtick has an article on Intel's Xeon 5570, the Xeon-derivative of Nehalem. Although it's supposed to be under wraps, HP and Fujitsu-Siemens pubbed the numbers and as far as we can see, the graphs are showing huge (and we mean warehouse-filling-with-old-parts huge) gains over the previous generations... get it here. µ

Share this:

Comments
X2 vs 5200, not 7200

So this 2.7GHz X2 competes 'well' with a value segment, 2.5GHz, 800MHz FSB (not 1066 or 1333), 2MB L2 (not 4MB or 6MB) cache as the 'standard' line of chips.... in games. Other reviews show the C2D 5200 being even or faster at computational problems (Photoshop, transcoding, etc.) But at least it uses a bit more power and can overclock 800MHz (as opposed to 1GHz or more). Got it.

posted by : fitten, 17 December 2008 Complain about this comment
Another incomprehensible benchmark

These guys always have weird articles. This one is no different.

It is yet another apples to spare tire comparison. At least, it shows that there is beginning to be some parity between the processors in many use cases. But as usual, they painted a picture THEY wanted people to see.

posted by : wingut, 17 December 2008 Complain about this comment
Nuclear Engineer/Physicist

I was just thinking, and this is not a slight against this particular article, but this entire site has become way too anti-Nvidia, Intel, Microsoft, etc. and way too pro-ATI, AMD, and Linux. This is not to say that journalism can be completely unbiased, and everybody likes an underdog, but I like reading this site, but ultimately I want news, not spin, and frankly all this site has to offer lately is spin. I'm definitely drifiting more towards [H]ard and Fudzilla... just thought you guys should know... and yes, I'm a bit drunk at present.

posted by : Z Tompkins, 17 December 2008 Complain about this comment
Better but...

These benchmarks were done with a radeon 4850... which is a fine card but not for benchmarking high end cpu's in gaming. So you can't put too much weight on those gaming results unless you're gaming on the cheap... in which case any of these cpu's is probably not on your shopping list.

otherwise I really dislike nvidia because I was burned by them years ago and haven't forgotten... but I do think the constant anti nvidia and pro amd/ati stuff is getting out of hand on this website. Realistically ati has better gpu's and intel has better cpu's. Nothing lately has changed that.

posted by : Andrew, 17 December 2008 Complain about this comment
Fiends

The Inq! You fiends. Writing core i7 965 in the headline to make more people click this lin'q.

Haha

posted by : Ikrana, 18 December 2008 Complain about this comment
Can we say Phenom II dont flops like intel ?

;-))

posted by : kalkzone, 18 December 2008 Complain about this comment
noticed that...

wow, the web site in the article you link first must be the uglyest pub-infested crappy designed site I have ever seen.

posted by : ewrwetg, 23 December 2008 Complain about this comment
$229 vs. the $1460 vs. the $1010

yes the title should be called that
just check newegg

posted by : boboo, 05 February 2009 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?