Louis Pasteur's theory of germs is ridiculous fiction - Pierre Pachet
THE NEW President Elect across the pond, Barack Obama ran his campaign with the "Change we can believe in" slogan. Now that change has got its own brand new .gov site.
Dubbed the "The Official Web Site of the The U.S. Presidential Transition", the site aims to inform the local populace about the plans of the soon-to-be POTUS and asks citizens for input. The speed at which the site has been put on-line clearly speaks volumes about the Obama team's use of "modern" technology - computers, we mean- specially compared to its adversaries whose candidate made campaign noise by admitting he isn't that good with those kind of electrical appliances.
In a first for "crowdsourcing", the site is asking citizens for input “Tell us your story, and the issues that matter most to you. Share with us your concerns and hope," suggests one section.
On blogs and newsgroups, advocates are going bonkers and submitting very innovative names and radical change ideas, for instance some have suggested Mr. Obama appoint Creative Commons creator and lawyer Lawrence Lessig to the airwaves watchdog, the FCC. That would certainly be a radical change and we'd be surprised if those suggestions are actually read and weighted and if Mr. Lessig agrees to such hypothetical job offering. The FCC was made famous during the G.W. Bush presidency by caring about slipped nipples and trying to impose Christian morals on TV.
While Obama voters and advocates submit their radical change ideas on the site on how to best lift the world's greatest superpower from the financial abyss, the "black man awarded the World's worst job", Reagan admirer Obama has been busy moving further to the political centre, with Stephen Zunes at Alternet noting that, "less than 24 hours after the first polls closed, the president-elect chose as his chief of staff - perhaps the most powerful single position in any administration - Rahm Emanuel, one of the most conservative Democratic members of Congress."
Change.gov and the dot-gov controversy
Blogger Michelle Malkin
writes
that the site "smells like a fund raising front" and adds, "It's being run by
Blue State Digital, the left-wing Internet fund-raising company that presided
over the credit card fraud-friendly Obama campaign site."
She objects the site's .gov top-level domain name pointing out that " Government domain names (.gov) for websites are supposed to be restricted to eligible government organizations and programs." Fellow bogger Ed Morrissey says "The incoming administration technically has no status as a government organiz ation or program until January 20, 2009. The Office of the President-Elect doesn’t exist within the government."
From the Middle East, a pundit claims the president-elect that brought us Change.gov is "doomed to be the next Jimmy Carter". "In the end he will go down in history as the man who achieved two great things: making America speak with a little more honesty than his predecessor did or his opponent would have done, and teaching Americans how to save and live frugally again."
On the left, they have other things to worry about: "I'm reminded of 1992," wrote Shag at CleanDraws.com. "They were flush with the anticipation that they could turn around the Reagan revolution. Clinton flushed that for them. Now they want to get it back, to try one more time." µ
L'INQs
Change.gov
The
Onion: Black Man given Nation's Worst Job
Nation
finally s##tty enough for Social Progress
Bush:
'Can I stop being President now?' - The Onion
Presidents
of the United States of America
All pundits, domestic and foreign, don't really supply formal proof that their assertions are anything more than people farting. 

"Obviously a lot of shelter dogs are mutts like me," said Mr Obama.

Mmmm m mm ... un smella voo feenay ... kel terriblay odeur!! Pard'm was ... après-midi le fudge is burning! A-a-ahhh. Le pussee ferocious! Remove zot skunk! Zot cat-pole from ze premises!! Avec!! Wee Wee! Roque the Casbah!!
If you recall the hints of Obama being a bit of an elitist (when he referred to the bitter Americans clinging to their guns and religion at an ultra-liberal event in San Francisco), is it starting to show through again?

The "office of the president elect"? What exactly is that office, I'm not familiar with it? Does he get paid for it? (not that he needs it) I agree with the blogger - It is a presumptious to be starting a .gov website when you are not formally part of the gov't yet.

It'll be interesting to see what happens on some tech issues - like Biden's friendliness with the MPAA/RIAA, the "fairness" doctrine - those unfamiliar, this is an attempt to limit the amount of right wing programming on the radio and force an even amount of programming, yet would not be applied, conveniently, to any other form of communication. A bit odd as in America one would think with freedom of speech, the radio stations would be able to decide on their own what programming they should have.

I'm just hoping someone who won 5.3 votes out of every 10, doesn't over-reach and is truly as mainstream and bi-partisan as his rhetoric suggests; unfortunately his limited voting record in the Senate suggests the exact opposite (not that anyone cares).
I don't get why the americans let the old president sit so long after a new one has been duly elected, sounds more like euro-style tardiness to me.
But regardless, if the people and the proper electoral process has elected someone to be president and it's only a delay allowing for a proper transition that is the issue I think it might be close enough to call it .government, only issue being the oath, but since bush has taken the oath twice and broken it within days, I guess americans don't put much stock in oaths anyway.
Oh and don't forget it's not obama that gave himself a .gov address, it had to be approved by the people in charge of managing .gov, he's not in control of that.
you know that during the oath, the person reading it misspoke and Obama let him correct himself. He was being polite, not that he failed to recite the oath