Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

More GTX 260 Core 216 versus HD 4870

Daily Wibblery Drivers, reviewers tweaked
Saturday, 22 November 2008, 16:56

HILBERT MUST BE going through Nvidia’s reviewer’s manual, as other sites have, and is retesting the GTX 260 Core 216 versus the HD 4870 1GB. The new drivers really give the GTX 260 Core 216 a boost, that’s for sure, although Guru 3D’s tests don’t show a clear enough advantage for a person to make a pick (possibly due to the Core i7 processor used). Check the testing, here.

Anandticks took the high-road and instead of gulping down a big dose of green, wrote up an interesting break-down of Forceware 180 features (you know, those that Big Bang II was delivered). No top five NV games tweaking here, so you’ll notice that 180 actually loses a bit compared to 178... funny, that.

Tweak Town is looking at the Asus Rampage II Extreme X58 motherboard. We guess Asus is running out of hyperboles to describe its mobos... The Rampage II Extreme goes hand in hand with the Core i7 processor, but neither are cheap, which make them good companions. Performance goes through the roof... right here.

Hardware Canucks got round to doing some Far Cry 2 tests. The game – now developed by Ubisoft Montreal – has great graphics as we all know and it runs well even on the lower-end of the high-end cards, meaning you needn’t buy the top performing cards to get it running well. Also, quad- and tri-core processors actually make good use of the extra cores over dual-cores. Very complete article, here.

Bit-Tech is doing part two of its DDR3 4GB memory roundup. As Core i7 comes into sight, memory makers are turning out high-performance memory at strict JEDEC-compliant voltages – 1.5V, as is this case. There’s an Elixir (Nanya) kit running a native DDR3-1600 part that powers on at 1.5V thrown in together with G.Skill, Patriot, Corsair and even some random DDR2-1066 for measure. You can read both parts here (Part 1) and here (Part 2)

The Atom is no great performer, we already knew that, but is it really worth taking into a desktop computer? Tom’s Shardware looks at the small-ish processor and compares it to an E7200 in a desktop computing environment. Apparently Atom is only good for devices that really need to save power, otherwise it struggles. Read the analysis here.

PlayReaction is back to the hardware review path. Today they’re testing a Creative Zen X-Fi. This model includes some simple additions that add a bit more value to the proposal. The wireless networking features, despite useful, need a little bit of polish. Apart from that, audio is great, says Christian.

Now that Core i7 is pushing DDR3 to the fore (the DRAMurai thank Intel) prices are coming down a teeny bit. XS Reviews took the opportunity to test out the Crucial Ballistix Tracer PC3-10600. It’s got LEDs for a bit of the flashy modder look and they perform adequately. Price is the clincher here: £82 for 2x1GB... not too bad... Read it here. µ

Share this:

Comments
Tesla & quadro have 240 Cores.

New Supercomputer Rampart is aided by both tesla & quadro cards, each with 240 cores. in fact some older supercomputers got quite lift back into top 500 circle with those cards.

Yet this core thing is very new to public. Larrabee, that now awaited cake of discrete gpu, has one huge problem, it has two way cache crossbar, similar to barcelona, so go figure. Hype of continuing advancement, Not all oranges are equal.

Keep Your Pants On Till Retailers Can Do Ultimate. 64 bit w/ warrentee.
drashek

posted by : MoreCor, 23 November 2008 Complain about this comment
New Farcry 2 review from www.hardwarecanucks.com

The GTX260 is going pretty well against the 4870 according to their latest Farcry 2 review

You can find their review here: 

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/11949-far-cry-2-hardware-performance-review.html

ALSO DO NOT FORGET TO SEE THIS ABOUT THE FORCEWARE 180.48 

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/11949-far-cry-2-hardware-performance-review-10.html

posted by : Steve, 23 November 2008 Complain about this comment
HILBERT SAYS NV WON

"The results speak for themselves, out of the 6 titles that we have shown you today, NVIDIA was able to pull ahead on the vast majority with it's GTX 260 core 216 (with regular clock frequencies). It's very typical for NVIDIA as usually, after half a year when you compare the numbers among driver releases, they roughly tweak out another 10% maybe 15% performance.

If you will allow me to be blunt for a second here: when we tally it up, that's 4 out of 6 wins for NVIDIA with the GeForce GTX 260 core 216. So this round the win goes to team green."

From page 9. One of those 4 was a complete BLOWOUT! 35% faster for NV or so...LOL. One of the two for ATI was 10%, the other though margin of error almost. So I'd say he's right. Go home with NV in this contest. Face it, ATI wasn't going to win forever...Get over it.

http://www.guru3d.com/article/top-10-games-with-radeon-4870-1-gb--geforce-gtx-260-core-216-test/9

posted by : The Jian, 23 November 2008 Complain about this comment
BS

We all now you're biased Inq, but come on. You get a bunch of negative comments for the article above so your response is just deleting the inappropriate ones? Nice. Why bother opening the post to comments at all? Sorry, guess everyone else isn't as big an ATI fanboi as you.

posted by : Bundy, 24 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Oops

Oops, I got this post mixed up with the last NV bashing post. My mistake. Hard to keep the NV bashing straight on this site sometimes.

posted by : Bundy, 24 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Browsers

Who will win the next round of browser wars?