The Inquirer-Home

Microsoft Intel rumours frankly, suck

Wild thing
Tue Jul 27 2004, 09:58
ONE OF THOSE RUMORS that just won't die is that about XP 64-bit. It goes like this, WinXP in 64-bit guise is late, way way late, and the release date is perpetually 'later'. Every time it moves out a few months, the rabid troll squad crawls out from under the bridge, and hijacks the message boards.

The rumor goes something like this, Intel was late with their 64-bit solution, and they were afraid of AMD. If AMD got a 64-bit windows version to advertise, it would seriously hurt P4 sales. So, Intel either bribed, threatened, or pulled strings to slow down Windows iAMD64, or whatever it is called this week.

With the Nocona benches leaking this week, the rumors started to run wild again, and frankly I am getting sick of them. They are simply not true. When asked flat out, both Intel and AMD people told me that Intel did not do anything to slow down Win iAMD64's release, it is simply the fault, good or bad, of MS.

Before you wonder how much Intel paid me to write that, let me say that the people I talked to, bitter CPU rivals, would tell me who is at fault if one of them were. OK, one of them would tell me, the other would hem and haw. They didn't, the story matched.

So, go back to the bridge, and put the conspiracies to rest for now. There is no grand plan, just programming to do. No story here, keep moving along. µ


Share this:

blog comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to INQ newsletters

Sign up for INQbot – a weekly roundup of the best from the INQ

INQ Poll

Heartbleed bug discovered in OpenSSL

Have you reacted to Heartbleed?