Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

INQ reveals the R680, Radeon HD 3870 X2

New Year offering at a shocking price
Friday, 9 November 2007, 12:39

IN FEBRUARY 2004, a game appeared from nowhere. The name of that game was Far Cry, and it transformed a small team from Germany into international gaming megastars.

It spurred a graphics card bonanza, one repeated by by Doom 3 and Half-Life 2, with the market massively going for Athlon 64+Nforce3/4 systems with Geforce 6800GT, 6800 Ultra for high-end and Geforce 6600 for mainstream.

Now the circle has turned again, with the release of Hellgate: London, Gears of War, Unreal Tournament 3 and Crysis. The time to get a new computer is now, and if you're asking yourself what would be the best $500 present under the Christmas tree, answer is two 8800GT or two 3870s, not an 8800GTX or 8800Ultra.

But, if you're willing to wait, this is what AMD has in store for January release.

Please allow me to introduce myself, my name is HD 3870 X2...
alt='r680'
RV670 times two, 512MB GDDR4 memory times two, DVI-HDMI adapter - times two, DisplayPort... erm...

As you can see, this longer board is on the trail of the 8800GTX/Ultra PCB. Unusually, there is no significant increase in the height of the board, meaning this dual-GPU card will fit it a more compact chassis.

The price of 3870 X2 will be between 399 and 499 USD/EUR, 249 and 299 quids (yes, life sucks in Bligthy).

RV670 chips are working at 750+ MHz each. 775 MHz should be reachable by launch time. Who knows, maybe even 800 MHz for the GPU. When it comes to overclocking, we have no idea at the moment, but the memory should be able to work at 2.25 GHz, yielding in combined bandwidth of 144 GB/s. Not too shabby.

Also, with R680, AMD is hoping to finally close the circle the compnay opened with Rage Fury MAXX. This card was hailed by none other than Dave Orton as the first multi-GPU product. But as we all know, there was a small company called 3dfx that did that some years before ATI kicked in. The only problem that Rage Fury MAXX had, was the fact that if you chose to use Windows 2000, Windows XP, or just about any operating system other than Win98/Me, you'd be sitting dead in the water.

With two RV670s inside, owners of this card will have a future since this board will come to market as 3870 X2 and FireStream 9170 X2, albeit with double or quadruple amount of memory (probably GDDR3, not GDDR4). R700 is also bringing MCM concept in the world of GPUs, so we're heading to one very, very interesting year.

Bear in mind that the G92_300 series, or D8E, the GeForce 8850GX2 or 8950GX2, whatever Nvidia marketeers figure it out to be - is also a dual-chip board. It is widely expected that Nvidia's card will be the same as 7900GX2 and 7950GX2, or a dual-PCB connected with 20-or-so connecting pins, all working in harmony with Nvidia's BR04 chip.

Radeon HD 3850, 3870, Nvidia GeForce 8800GT (and soon new G92-based GTS), and now Radeon HD 3870 X2 and Nvidia GeForce 8xx0GX2. Life doesn't get boring in the 3D industry. ยต

Share this:

Comments
Dammit!

Here I was hoping they would have went MCM for R680. Or at least Dual socket with both sharing the Ring Memory bus. But just a crossfire linked dual card... Sigh. Not too impressed. Come on ATI/AMD show some of that innovative stuff Athlons were made of!

posted by : Adam, 09 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Sorry

You lost me somehwere between RV670s, 3870 X2, FireStream 9170 X2 and G92_300, 8850GX2, 8950GX2, 7900GX2, 7950GX2, BR04, HD 3850, 3870, 8800GT, G92-based GTS, HD 3870 X2, 8xx0GX2.


posted by : Infidel, 09 November 2007 Complain about this comment
As exciting as this sounds...

It seems to me ATI's recent track record has been cards that sound fantastic on paper but underperform when actually delivered (and delivered late as well)! Hopefully ATI won't be doing that again with this card.

I probably won't be waiting anyway, as I want to play GoW and Crysis now and the 8800GT looks like the best option (if I can find one in stock)!

posted by : Photoboy, 09 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Driver

It's got to be a Crossfire driver... otherwise, why would AMD have put so much time and effort into it?

posted by : Alexko, 09 November 2007 Complain about this comment
AMD/ATI Driver Really Needs To Be Looked At.

Hey, AMD/ATI drivers really need to be looked at because there are always alot of bugs. Why don't they look at the OMEGA Driver Guy and HIRE HIM!!! Hello!! We have these buggy drivers and this guy spends his day fixing them and adding feature and functionalities. Like hire the goddamn guy. If AMD/ATI wants to take over the Graphics Card Industry we need some good drivers. Maybe they need to look at releasing a driver every 3-6 months insuring that its stable and that there are no bugs before being released.

posted by : Infidelity, 09 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Drivers + ATi

Did you ever try to setup a stable 880 when they first came out? The forceware was just as bad as catalyst 7.7 for the HD2x00 series. Early drivers are never capable of releasing the cards potential, give it a months for Catalust 7.11 and we'll have something far better to work with.

The idea of a crossfire set card could go both ways. 2 GPU's with a single memory buss will be staggeringly powerful if you can add a second card in 'normal' crossfire mode.

Besides, ATi do all the best work. They make the technology which is then used in the industry. Imagine if ATi had not released PCI-E as a standard, but instead kept the x16 speed bus for themselves leaving nVidia to use x8 AGP? Granted, the courts would ignore Microsoft for a while and start a monopoly case against ATi, but nVidia would be left stranded in the performance scene. 

Regardless of what we finally see from this chip, i'd rather see GDDR4 memory and a sensible warning on the box about PSU requirement...

posted by : RicWin, 10 November 2007 Complain about this comment
PCI express

"imagine if ATi had not released PCI-E as a standard, but instead kept the x16 speed bus for themselves leaving nVidia to use x8 AGP?"

Intel was the primary benefactor behind PCI express, not ATI.

posted by : jeff, 10 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Windows 7 impressions

How is windows 7 working out for you?