Writing the news, raising hell, and telling truth to power - Egan Orion
Subject: Western Digital launches 320GB
Dear newsdesk,
is it possible when describing storage capacity to include pirated DivX movie capacity? From my collection (2300+ titles) I roughly estimated that 1Gb storage can hold 90 minutes of quality (as content, not as picture) movies. It is very useful when you are on the move constantly.
Todorov
Subject: Microsoft slammed for badmouthing benchmark; Nick White's incolence..
Ehehe.. That was great!!
The fast-motion video gave me a laugh too.. - I mean, c'mon Nick, the 'execution speed' IS EXACTLY relative to cpu performance - as-per-resource-availability - this, directly relative to how much 'resource' the OS has left it to use!
Ehehaahah!! Dum***..
Wouldn't mind sharing thizz in letters!
Locc
Subject: AMD L3 bug
Same darn L3 bug that existed in ALL AMD mp capables, starting with k7
No, they never fixed it, they discounted it due to where it was showing up: concurrent 16bit and 32bit FP operations incorrectly flagging good cache data as bad. And that wasn't the only problem with L3. Some of them they didn't have a clue where they were coming from, and the policy was to hush-hush.
So, no, it surprises me not, AMD has cache problems. Apparently they are getting worse due to thier chosen design path.
You know as well as I do that Intel also hit critical design problems with their NetBurst, only AMD has not the capacity to Intel it's way out of it.
Robert B
Subject: Billion
"A British billion is different from an American billion. But it is still alot of zeroes."
No it isn't! They're both 1000,000,000.
And they have been taught that way in school for decades!
Martin Richards
Subject: Google / Solar conspiracy theory !
... or not.
Just noticed that as part of Google's "Renewable Energy Cheaper Than Coal " initiative one of the companies they're pimping is eSolar for their solar thermal solution. I recalled that eSolar is a sister company to Energy Innovations who have been working on advanced concentrating Solar PV for years and both live under the Idealab umbrella and then I remembered that Energy Innovations also has a commercial Solar PV installation arm using current off-the-shelf PV kit, EI Solutions, which somewhat coincidentally recently completed Google's 1.6 MW solar PV system.
I keep trying to inflate this into some giant conspiracy involving teams of EI Solution's ninja solar installers infiltrating the Googleplex under cover of lunch to plant glowing reports about eSolar on Sergey and Larry's desks or nobble the opposition but its far more likely that they just like eSolar's approach ... <sigh>. Then again having EI Solutions on site maybe got the eSolar boys 5 minutes in front of the Google chaps and it went from there ?
Roj
Green stuff from the G'Plex :
http://www.goo
gle.com/corporate/green/energy/
eSolar's not terribly informative web site :
http://www.esolar.com/
EI Solutions web site :
http://www.eispv.com
Energy Innovations FAQ page mentioning both eSolar and EI Solutions :
http://www.energyinn
ovations.com/faq/
Idealab umbrella corp. :
http://www.idealab.com/
Subject: XP?
Shouldn't they being trying to put Vista on it - as XP is a dead OS, because
Vista is SO much better!
Bill
Subject: Facial recognition matches Mike Magee with Omar Sharif
ROFL!! This is one of the funniest articles I've read in a while! Thanks for the laugh :-)
Alex
Subject: Better than USPTO
Its a lot more better than USPTO approach where in it considers glowing mac icons and and inventing a product like an aeroplane(when i say aeroplane, i mean the same calibre of invention) at the same level. In my opinion software inventions should not get more than 3-4 years protection.
Anoop
Subject: Verbs
"2. Size Matters - Time Magazine. [That's not a headline, it hasn't got a verb in it. Ed.]"
"matters" is the verb..
try it in other sentences and you'll agree...if it matters..
M Wallack
Subject: Horrible experience with Dell
I am having a horrible experience with Dell. No, not their computers. I have been buying Dell with little to no problems. My problem now is that I am unable to contact them to ask questions about a new computer. When I try to customize one on their site I am required to do things that make no sense. I am unable to e-mail them to ask questions. Furthermore, they no longer provide a mailing address. I tried mailing a letter to them using an address off of the receipt from the last computer I bought but it was returned as an invalid address. After attempting to customize a computer on their site I received an e-mail from them asking questions about the use of their site. I told them my problems and ask that I be contacted by somebody. I have been completely ignored. I would like to mail the CEO and let him have it. Where is Dell located? Do you have a mailing address? Quite frankly I would rather not buy from them but my computer tech swears by them. I think they are assholes!
Ted Corporandy
Subject: Fishy
Something smells fishy. Look at their numbers.
The GT 256 scores exactly the same on Lost Planet in 12x10 and 16x10.
In Bioshock the card with twice the memory is actually SLOWER than the new one.
If these benches prove to be correct, I cannot understand their conclusion at all. The card suffers real hard in UT2k3 (any reason they benched this particularly old game?) and Stalker at relatively low res of 12x10 already. Like it's bigger brother, the 256 MB-version struggles to keep the framerate up at some point. The difference is, with less memory, this happens a lot earlier and at settings where 3850/70 are still playable.
Also, they put street price of a rarely available product up against MSRP. AMD's actual MSRP for 3870 ist 219$ and the INQ has a news up that that number has been dropped to 199$ as well.
So AMD has a card with twice the memory, better, faster memory at that, a lot higher number of stream processors and it's super-quiet dual-slot-cooler make this one a nice, checkbox-ridden card.
If you put those to up against each other in the stores, at the same price, which one do you think will be sold?
Riddling
Subject: Intel Copied Everything from AMD
You could also say they copied the IMC idea from Intel.
Remember Timna? That's Intel with, what, graphics AND memory on-die? Sure Alpha had that, but Intel STILL had it before AMD did. Obviously they still killed the product, but the idea was theirs even before AMD. And What about AGP, HDMI, PCI, USB, PCI-E? I mean Intel really pioneered a LOT of things in the industry. And of course we won't forget that AMD used to just make copies of Intel chips, and in fact sued Intel for not just giving them their designs with I believe the 286. And yes, they had an agreement to do that and Intel violated that agreement, but the fact is that AMD didn't really do anything for a while besides copy Intel.
Now I think AMD DID come up with the idea for x86-64, as far as I know, but that's about it. When you really get down to it, AMD has done almost nothing for the industry besides copy Intel, and lower Intel's prices. If it wasn't for IBM demanding that Intel finance AMD as a competitor to them so they wouldn't be dependent on Intel as a sole supplier of chips, AMD might not even exist today.
Anyway, just my two cents.
DJ Krypplephite
Subject: Trying to rationaize crime
I hope the RIAA is allowed to up the damages to $10,000 per copy plus all court costs. In addition a six month jail sentence is appropriate for the B.S. appeals when it's a known fact that the crime was willfully committed and this criminal is getting off lightly.
Randy
Subject: mis understanding of OOXML problem
The problem arising from OOXML occurred in subcommittee 34 (SC34) of the joint committee between ISO and IEC (JTC1). It never affected all of ISO. It still prevents SC34 from getting anything done.
The PDF specification is being approved by subcommittee 2 of technical committee 171. It has nothing to do with JTC1 and surely has nothing to do with SC34 of JTC1.
It's one thing for the average person to have no idea how ISO or IEC works, and to think the OOXML issue affects all of ISO, and to have no idea that IEC is just as affected by the OOXML issue as ISO is, but any respectable journalist should do some research and try to understand what they're reporting on.
The Inquirer should be ashamed to be associated with such bad reporting.
Herorev
Subject: Western Digital launches 320GB
Can you break that down into Comcast download limits?
Thanks
Dilbert
Subject: New Airport In Bangalore
The traffic in the city is too bad the old airport to AMD office takes about a 2 hours (Anytime of the day), If AMD is setting up a new office I am pretty sure they would consider this in the equation and move it closer to the New Airport.
Anoop
A Billion here in the UK is commonly known as one million million (1,000,000,000,000) whereas the yanks of course use the term Billion to mean one thousand Million. 

I don't know what educational facilities have been teaching you the merkin Billion but make them STOP!
The only ones that know exactly what a Billion is are Americans, as their Billion is: 1000,000,000

Where European (no thanks to the USA) can decide to use either:

1000,000,000 (USA)

OR 

1,000,000,000,000 (European countries)

But that's not the only trouble, see for yourself:

http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutwords/billion?view=uk
The British Billion is 1,000,000 x 1,000,000

However since this is rarely ever entertained in financial circles, we use the US billion which is 1000 X 1,000,000 in everyday language. 

however the are correct in that the British billion is 1,000,000 x 1,000,000
Newsflash: AMD has never utilized an L3 cache before, so this couldn't be a pre-existing bug.

Numbnuts
AMD did use L3 cache in the K6-3 and K6-3+ CPU's. Or were they before your time?
AMD has had an L3 cache bug since K7? This is the first time they've done an L3 cache, ever. Which universe were you from where AMD had an L3 in their K7 processors?
K7 and later are based on licensed tech, and have absolutely nothing in common with K6. In addition, K6 had its L3 cache off chip which isn't even remotely similar to the modern way of doing things. Unless some bizarre, supernatural event is causing AMD to have trouble with L3, there is no correlation between bugs in K6 and bugs in K7-10. Or was the K6 before your time?
It seems that you're right, it is possible to have a L3 for K6-III, but it was an on-motherboard 1MB chip. I would hardly consider that as an exclusively AMD problem unless it's on-die.
AMD L3 bug - Richard B
Newsflash: AMD has never utilized an L3 cache before, so this couldn't be a pre-existing bug.

Numbnuts
posted by : shaidarharan, 07 December 2007
Newsflash: Numbnuts
AMD did use L3 cache in the K6-3 and K6-3+ CPU's. Or were they before your time?
posted by : Moe Tard, 07 December 2007

I don't think that would qualify as the same thing. The K6-3 contained no on die L3 like the K10 does. The K6-3 was AMD's first chip with on die L2 cache, while the L3 was simply SRAM chips located on the motherboard that were riding the FSB along with SDRAM. It's probably also worth noting that not all motherboards even had the onboard SRAM that would become the K6-3's L3, and could be disabled in BIOS. Aside from sharing the name "L3" I seriously doubt they share much else in common.
In my EU country we generally avoid the billion altogether and use milliard, meaning one thousand million.

Btw, Wikipedia has some lucid info on the subject and the history and differences, for those not afraid of it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales
"Same darn L3 bug that existed in ALL AMD mp capables"

Well, considering AMD never used L3 before, I guess it existed in "all zero of them"...
Guys, the thing is that billion US dollars is still different from billion British Pounds! I think this is the only difference.......
All Billions are equal unless you're a hard drive manufacturer, in which case some how 1,000,000,000 = 1,073,741,824 or is it the other way around.

Thus your new WD 320GB laptop drive only hold 298GB in the real world.


We should also remember that the Intel 16 and 32 bit ISA's were evolved from the original 8008, the instruction set of which was designed by CDC. Therefor Intels whole line of x86 chips derives from a CDC design which they copied. So since Intel copied AMD's 64 bit ISA, that makes Intel having copied an ISA twice (CDC then AMD), AMD once (Intel). Two to one in AMD's favour.
It is also helpful to reflect on the fact taht while AMD may have copied the ISA (as Intel originally did from DCD) they still designed the micro-architecture (imported from companies they purchased) as does Intel. Thats where the time effort and skill mostly go. Designing an ISA must be childs play relatively speaking compared to the micro-architecture, so both Intel and AMD deserve the credit for their own designs.