I certainly do not drink all the time. I have to sleep you know - WC Fields
TWO O'CLOCK GMT is coming about and the hapless shackled hounds of bogdom are about to have the bolts through the necks clicked around to "print".
The besuited corporate henchment with whom these peddlars of marketese have inked a bloody pact are finally allowing spineless signers of Non-Disclosure Agreements masquerading as members of the press to print what the know.
Publish and be damned, our hairy Aris.
The GTX280 is now avaiiable for £470
The more affordable GTX260 has a price of £270 but isn't in stock yet.
I think I'll stick with my G92 GTS
By NOT being able to print statement as recieved, it allows tiers of (Ms.)information to develope, many NOT Even of nvidia gameboards in Picture.
So IT IS No Brainer.
Stewie drashek L.I.P & Sell #.8
The problem is that Charlie's articles are bullcrap and no-one rational will buy anything that expensive based on just one lousy leaked review. So we have to wait until the NDA goes off. What's the point in leaking all the info then if it's no use?
wow...every second article includes some whining about the fact that NVidia doesn't want to play with the INQ anymore. It really starts to get annoying.

There are only two things to read on this site anymore:
1. NVidia is bad
2. the new ATI cards will crush the new NVidia cards.

I am not even sure that ATI can compete with the current NVidia cards. ATI/AMD did disappoint with the 2xxxx-series, with the 3xxx-series, with the years delayed Phenom, which could not even beat the older CPUs from Intel, but of course the 4xxx series will be great.

It would be very nice to not spread this FUD until the GTX260/280 and the HD 4850/4870 and maybe HD 4870 X2 are out there and there are real world information about their performance. I don't know if the new ATI cards are better than the new NVidia cards, or equal or slower. But at least I don't post the same FUD over and over and over again.