FRUIT-THEMED toymaker, Apple has been accused of over-marketing its ability to patch its software.
The advertisements might give you the impression that OS-X is jolly well written and secure, but it seems that the Cappuccino outfit is not quite as secure as the Umpire of Evil Microsoft.
At a recent Black Hat security conference, delegates were shocked to be told by boffins from Swiss Federal Institute of Technology that Apple’s performance on patches was, er... patchy.
The boffins looked at how many times over the past six years the two vendors were able to have a patch available on the day a vulnerability became publicly known, which they call the zero-day patch rate. They then took this number and divided by their shoe size and discovered that there were 658 vulnerabilities affecting Microsoft products and 738 affecting Apple.
This might be OK if Apple ever bothered to patch them particularly fast. The boffins said that Apple was below 20 unpatched vulnerabilities at disclosure consistently before 2005 but these days Apple is always above that figure.
The net result is that the number of unpatched vulnerabilities are higher at Apple.
One of the reasons is that while Vole has been chummy with the security community, Apple keeps them at arms’ length. µ
L'Inq
What the hell? Where are the fanboy-ish comments in favor of Mr Jobs? Common! Where's the fun in an INQ's anti-Apple article without that blessed words in the bottom?

Confœderatio Helvetia fingers the holes in Jobs' Apple. Where is the Swiss Army knife with the attached Guinness' world's smallest revolver, the Swiss MiniGun, when Apple needs one? Well there's always the cider. The Appletian Fanbois and Fangurls will have to earn their patches' merit in the great Mac Air. First, each cub must earn a Safari badge. When they've reached the rank of Leopard explorers, well then, they'll be as spot on as the Swiss Guard is striped!

Mycelo, I hope this helps. I'm not as good a scoutmaster as Jedi Farrell:-)

But they sure can be tweaked if you want to. And it looks like that's what happened in this case, the numbers were interpreted in a way that made Apple look bad. Besides, it wouldn't make much of a story if they attacked Microsoft, everyone who read it would just yawn and move on <GRIN>.