Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

EMI wants to cut RIAA and IFPI funding

Not value for money
Thursday, 29 November 2007, 15:34

RECORD label EMI has woken up to the fact that the RIAA and IFPI is making it about as popular as the Boston Strangler.

According to Reuters, the hawker of popular beat recordings wants to cut its funding to the RIAA and IFPI.

The two organisations have been spending a fortune threatening students who use p2p software with court action unless they pay extortionate fines.

But a source inside EMI said the record label, which was recently taken over by a private equity group Terra Firma, was looking at ways to "substantially" reduce the amount it pays trade groups.

Terra Firma is reorganising EMI in a bid to make the outfit more profitable as CD sales have fallen. It seems that the new blood does not think paying large amounts of money to the RIAA and IFPI is a good investment.

The four major record labels EMI, Warner, Sony BMG and Universal each give these anti-piracy groups about $132.1 million each.

The others have not said if they will be reducing the amount of money they are giving to the RIAA and IFPI.

Reuters says the IFPI was looking at ways it could tighten its belt. µ

µ

Share this:

Comments
I want to hump EMI right now...

Honestly this news makes me want to go buy something from EMI right now. Anyone telling these RIAA/IFPI fat cats that their days are numbered is just flat out awesome.

posted by : Trent, 29 November 2007 Complain about this comment
It's only a matter of time

First companies start ditching DRM, now EMI is pulling its funding. Maybe in 5 years all that shite will be gone, the fight that's impossible for them to win over.

I bet they could do a lot to improve their products with $132mil extra to play with.

posted by : Polynikes, 29 November 2007 Complain about this comment
it's been so long...

...since I heard an album i'd actually want to spend money on, do EMI have any decent artists these days ?

Per the other comment:

I'd rather buy EMI !

(if they're being serious about ditching these extortionists)

posted by : Colin Wilson, 29 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Wow.

If they actually do this, I'm going to buy about five EMI albums instantly and keep an eye on their catalog henceforth. That would be FANTASTIC.

posted by : perisoft, 30 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Things are looking up . . for consumers that is

We knew that RIAA et al were just parasites, now it seems that some corporations have caught on as well.
This is great ! 

Unless you actually work for those bloodsuckers that pretend to want to redistribute the wealth to musicians. In that case, it's not so good.

But hey, the majority wins here, so it's still great !

posted by : Pascal Monett, 30 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Finally...

...some good news. Maybe I can afford music in the future!

posted by : Trenty, 30 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Muzak

Wow - 132 Mio. dollaros. One would think the companies just might've stumbled on the idea that their sales are being sliced and diced because of their respective policies - after all, what sane adult wants to see, hear or even go near Christina Aguilera, Britney Spears, and wotnot?

Now imagine spending 132 mio. dollars on musicians with original ideas. They might even just sell cds.

posted by : Trolljohn, 30 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?