GOVERNMENT PLANS to introduce a database that holds the academic records of every child in the land from the age of 14 until the day they die have come under attack from all quarters.
Going by the track record of our civil service in handling people's personal data, the database might not be wise, representatives of parents, teachers, head masters and the Conservatives said told The Times newspaper today.
But there are possibly more important causes for concern about the database, which will store the academic achievements and failures and give employers access to the information.
"This disregards how people change throughout their lives," Professor Priscilla Alderson, a children's rights expert at the University of London's Institute of Education, told The INQUIRER.
The system could be used to "stigmatise" children with their school records by making them indelible, she said, and presumed that employers had some right to know everything about a person's history.
"Academic records are no indication of future success. There are many reasons for the grades we get: they might reflect the teaching or a personal crisis," she said.
"People who do badly at school often do well later in life. There's a danger that these records prevent change and progress for the better," she added.
Phil Booth, national co-ordinator of the No2ID campaign group said in a written statement: "Numbered for life and with every black mark against you made public, you’ll never be able to make up for a bad year at school."
“Tag ‘em young and track them for life might work for cattle but it’s not how a fair and just society treats people, especially children. Official CV, unique number or ID card, it’s all just about the state telling you – and others – who you are,” he added.
The Learning and Skills Council, which intends to operate the database, said children would have control over their own Learner Records, deciding who should have access.
"It is not a tracking system and will not include information on exclusions or expulsions. It will only hold factual information such as name, surname, age, postcode, qualifications achieved and courses attended," saids the LSC in a statement.
It said the Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner had approved the scheme.
The Times had reported from a government leak that the plans, to be announced tomorrow, would have the database include records of expulsions and exclusions. It did not say whether it would also note attitude, attendance, detentions, and propensity to daydream. µ
Apparently they are trying to make up for teachers telling kids that "this will go on your permanent record", but actually creating a permanent record.
The next version will start tracking children at their conception, in order to maximize available data.
They will be graded on the speed at which the ovocyte completed its divisions, the efficiency with which the various cells migrate to their appropriate positions, and the rate of failure of RNA and DNA replication.
Version 3 will actually include statistics on how many sperm took part in the race, as well as the speed at which the winning sperm got to the egg.
www.lottodrawn.com - Lotto 6/49, 5/40, Joker, strategies, win plans.
Einstein failed maths.
Why are they doing this ? Has anyone stopped to ask. It seems that the money could be put to a better use or is there another reason that nobody wants to admit. It seems to me "1984" is just coming a little later.
I'd better detwaddle my Curriculum Vitae; the Relevant Fodder section likely does not include my studies on Egyptian Hieroglyphics or Radio Theatre.
Nothing is perfect, so who gets sued for libel when some error in the database classifies someone applying for a job as a liar?