The Inquirer-Home

AMD, Intel agree to agree on discovery

Consultant doing the old forensics
Mon Jan 30 2006, 11:19
THE JUDGE IN the antitrust case AMD is levelling against Intel in a Delaware court signed a chit last week agreeing third party firms were released from their non-disclosure obligations.

Both firms asked the judge to give the go-ahead on that in mid January, as we reported here.

Some of the firms subpoenad by AMD had declined to provide documents, emails and other material to the court because they had feared they might breach their legal obligations to Intel.

The Honourable Joseph J. Farnan Jr ordered the waiver of contractual non disclosure provisions, and also signed notices of service for production of documents and "things" by Intel and by AMD last week.

It's unclear whether all of these "things" will be made available for the public to pore over - typically in such cases some information is held by the court under seal, until such times as either a case comes to court or is settled.

Those "things" number 218 and Kelly J. Kuchta, a senior consultant and the owner of Forensics Consulting Solutions LLC has been retained by AMD. This document is of some interest to all corporations and companies, we suspect.

No doubt it is also of interest to the legion of plaintiffs who are following on the coat tails of all this paperwork and activity. The number of those plaintiffs is so great now that we've lost count. µ

See Also
AMD and Intel trial coverage and reports

Share this:

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?