Don't think there are no crocodiles because the water is calm - Malay proverb
AFTER YEARS OF enjoying a near monopoly on graphics card benchmarketing, it appears Futuremarks could be losing its seat, or bench rather, to rival Sisoft and its attractive sounding Sandra 2009 – officially released today.
Apparently fed up with Futuremarks for not yet officially supporting GPU physics, many OEM's (including Dell, Fujitsu Siemens and Medion) along with several websites have decided to make the switch and use Sandra instead, which has ported its suite of CPU tests to run on GPGPU. A very attractive quality indeed.
Sandra 2009, a suite of modules which lets users analyse their computers’ performance and see what makes them tick, gives special attention to general purpose graphics processing, as well as ways to measure framebuffer bandwidth. ‘She’ also puts Radeon, Geforce as well as Intel and AMD CPUs through their paces, and the Sisoft people have also added tests to run programmable shaders (DirectX 10.1, 10.0, 9c) for those users without GPGPU-capable cards or drivers.
But the shift, which seems to have taken quite a few industry veterans by surprise, also seems to vindicate the growing view that while in the past GPUs were only useful when it came to games or graphics, today they can also be used for heavy computational workloads and software other than video games. This doesn’t mean the end is nigh for the CPU by any means though. According to Sisoft’s head programmer, Adrian Silasi, “a very fast CPU is still needed to feed all the (GP)GPUs just like with current games.”
Not just a pretty face, another much-heralded feature of the new and remodelled Sandra is that the 2009 version DirectX tests support both Crossfire and SLI. Additionally, the GPGPU tests are multi-card compatible (for anything up to eight), but current drivers do need Crossfire/SLI to be disabled for multi-GPGPU to work.
Futuremark spokesman, Oliver Baltuch, diplomatically noted that “Futuremark welcomes all new benchmarks and generally thinks that the more benchmarks that are available for the public to use, the better informed decision that can be made when they make their purchase of new hardware.”
He added: “Sissoft Sandra has been a widely respected benchmark for many years and we hope that it continues to do very well in our industry.”
Bottom line, however, is that all this Sandra bullocks is probably good news for the folks down in ATI, because now that Sisoft has ported CPU benchmarks to vendor-specific programming environments (AMD CAL, Nvidia CUDA) to run on GPGPU, the firm might finally be able to see some sort of proper proof that physics really does run on its parts. µ
"Sandra bullocks" oh ho ho ho..... ah ha ha ha. The side splitting humor.... it kills.
sandra is about as accurate an indicator of performance as a 3yr old watching the finish line at the drags.

so heavily skewed towards their sponsors parts its unreal that anyone considers it a benchmark. its more like executable propaghanda for a certain chipmaker.
Sandra Best, yet for intercompatibilites, its often Way off. Also numbers may be generated from "Should Be" like all other similar models. It is greatly detailed & One of best glimpses' into insides of your own system
. 3DM has yet to tune its audiance into how numbers ADD up, Worse its '8 v.1.1, so best is gone or ?unwisely traded.

Real big thing its New, Theres NO Bad Bristles predicted & for future, Your already working on Machine that made Mice Age Cometh:Sperm Wahles to Rescue & Ahab, Schooner Mom. well in array of 100. So mere one could do few minutes per year, without synergy & oneness of thought, about 10 or so photoshops daily, then theres video, Ultee' Reporter & RadioSher SD Vista Guitar, Now down to LOW price of $69, I mean for Genuine Stratocaster, Mac.
Sheksher Be Complete....with so much communication power.
drashek
So I tried sandra2009, it didn't detect my java, claimed I didn't have it, it didn't detect my ATI streamcomputing dll's either, and it had a checkbox during install asking me to allow it to 'update your security certificates', I declined but the installer didn't seem it was possible someone would and tried to run it anyway although it didn't have it in TMP folder so it stopped with an error, then I started the program and there were no modules, so I removed it again and did the whole thing again and then there were modules, but strangely enough some had current hardware in the list to compare to and some did not, and the graphics one had every imaginable combination of the latest ATI cards but only one nvidia card, the 9600.
All in all I'm not impressed, they need to get their act together and get a new provider for their installer roo.
Well, we know that 3dmark scores can be manipulated and bought, so this is a refreshing breath of fresh air.

Don't think the greens will be best pleased as they usually the ones writing the cheques [alledgedly]...

3dmark was pretty much fully discredited by its past antics now anyway.