The Inquirer-Home

Ultimate bang for buck CPU reviewed

Yule Day Rounds Rebirth of the 300A
Tue Dec 25 2007, 11:44

WHILE INTEL AND AMD are duking it out in the “enthusiast” segment of computing, one of the littl’uns gets its 15 minutes of fame at Hardspell. They’ve “reviewed” – I use this term loosely - the E1600 Celeron and stuck it into a monster system for a little round of benchmarks.

The little performer actually overclocks quite well from its native 2.4GHz speed, they upped the FSB by 50% and ran it at 3.6GHz. Their bench results increased by about the same, too. If the numbers are anything to go by, they’re talking 12388 3Dmarks in ’06. All together now: “Celeron 300A!!!”

Gainward is one of those vendors that takes longer to resurface with new products, but usually come out with a highly tweaked and overwhelming product. In this case XBit Labs benched the Gainward Bliss 8800GT 512MB Golden Sample GLH. Pre-overclocked, near-silent and HDMI sound output, the only snag they had was the cooling system that was less than perfect in its job and caused the occasional overheat and hang (though we imagine it’s something simple to rectify). Performance is massive, with some benchies scoring close to the 8800GTX.

Generation 3D compares “Extreme” processors from different generations, a QX9650 and a QX6700. Different processes, different caches, one’s a tick the other’s a tock. They are both tremendous overclockers, thinks the reviewer, with the QX9650 reaching 4.1GHz and the QX6700 at 3.85GHz. The performance differences blur in gaming, but are more obvious when it comes to video encoding and other multimedia apps.

The website formerly known as Adrian’s Rojak Pot has posted a thorough 8800GT overclocking guide. Although they stick to the stock cooler, they report decent overclockability and not much heat being generated there at all. We can’t really explain how they’re getting such low temps on an overclock using the stock cooler, though.

OCWorkbench fools around with a GeCube HD3850 OC Edition. This card comes factory OC’d at 722/725 and instead of the standard cooling solution common to all 3850’s it uses an X-Turbo III. It’s a heatpipe+fan design that takes up two slots, effectively doubling the card’ s footprint. Well, that’s ok when they get to the benchies. The HD3850 OC Edition scores almost as high as its bigger brother, the 3870. They’re actually selling these cards down under for around $250 AUS, or approx. 217 buckaroos Stateside.

Anandtech’s Jarred Walton has the skinny on a new 24-inch LCD screen from HP, the w2408. It’s on the cheaper side of cheap ($570) and it’s a pretty standard affair when it comes to features. The design, however, is pretty novel. It’ll interest consumers on a budget, like the author says, but don’t disregard the other offers on the market. µ

Share this:

Comments
Is That ULTIMATE?

More & More Vista is breaking thru, yet not in AERO Glass, ULTIMATE. Notice pics, screen shots clearly show NOT aero glass. good scores, yet not actual testbed of Vista, so dweeb chumpo.

Heres better controller: mcp 78 a/s 

http://en.hardspell.com/doc/showcont.asp?news_id=2137 

its runs vista at twice basic '6 3d score, whopping 750, of course thats just mainboard & it is twice 300 or so scores of last years 6x controllers, so another good shot, if its ULTIMATE better, yet perhaps ethier system will score ULTIMATE as well as NT5, XP/Vista.

Also of note is that Celeron is processor that did job, same as my first tests in summer '5, perhaps ULTIMATE is so large that smaller processor allows better control or less hammered down to XP/NT5, Weakie 16 bit stuff & can allow 32 bit ULTIMATES' NT6 more breath on its own.
AWITING NEXT TEST SERIES & 8XXX controllers to weed out xp ickie edition snafus...

thomas s von drashek

posted by : ULTIE_TOM, 26 December 2007 Complain about this comment
C300A

Not really.... the C300A was in part such a success because they could be placed in dual socket boards. 

Not so now. The only 'True Celeron 300A' right now would be a very overclockable dualsocket 'true quadcore' chip.

But alas, they are nowhere to be found.
Times have changed, or haven't they ?

posted by : Aryan, 26 December 2007 Complain about this comment
I'm not Impressed...

I don't know where have you been for the past years, but 50% clock increase could not be characterized as "unseen since Celeron 300B", and definitely should not be called an "ultimate".

Many PIII Coppermines and Celerons were able to run at 50% highter clock, and some of them even without Vcore voltage increase. Celeron 633MHz would be a good example.

Currently I have Celeron 420 (1.6GHz, 800MHz FSB) which is rock solid at 2.66GHz (1333MHz FSB), without any Vcore voltage increase or extreme cooling solutions. This is about 63% clock increase, which is pretty common for this particular model, as I heard it. The best part is that I've paid for it less then 30€. Now that should be an "ultimate bang for buck CPU". :)

posted by : Marcus Magick, 26 December 2007 Complain about this comment
8800GT overclocking...

It's not overheating because stock cards run their fan at 29% speed. It's silent (more or less) but makes the card hot. They've put it to 100% making it loud but much cooler (they say 10-12C)...

Now read a bit before posting, would you? :)

posted by : Luka, 26 December 2007 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?