Fibre optics - the healthy version of eye candy - Barry Cryer
Intel had argued that allegations relating to foreign commerce could not be ruled on in a US court, citing numerous previous precedents.
Judge Joseph Farnan agreed with Intel lawyers, that allegations in paragraph 40-44, 54-57, 74-75, 81, 83, 96, 89, 93-94, 100-101 and 106 would be struck from the case.
In his opinion, the judge said that after considering AMD's case in a "light most favourable", he found that his court lacks jurisdiction over claims related to Japanese OEMs, European OEMs, and German retailers.
These formed a considerable chunk of AMD's original 428 page filing. However, AMD is also pursuing Intel in Europe and in Japan. This is a war of attrition. µ
See Also
Full coverage of AMD Intel case