AMD CURRENTLY HAS the best integrated graphics chipset on the market, the 780G, but it was just dethroned. Luckily, it is by a derivative chipset, the AMD 790GX, an upclocked 780G with a new south bridge and a lot of tweaks.
To be fair, lets start out by saying that it is not just a 780G with the clock turned up, but a third generation 780G. The first one was the one you know and love, until today the fastest integrated chipset out there bar none. The second generation started out with the chipset which went into the Puma laptops, and it brought some power-saving twists here and there. The third gen is the 790GX, and it has all of those additions, and some performance tweaks on top.
From the first time we showed you pics of the board, you will notice that it has two PCIe2 16x slots, and that is the key to the naming difference. In AMD newspeak, the 780 series has one 16x slot, and the 790 has at least two. We won't mention how suffixes confuse the issue, that would be double plus ungood. In any case, the PCIe2 lanes are the same, it just splits them into two 8x electrical channels, more than good enough for what you need to do.
How fast is fast? Well, the 780V ran at 300MHz, the 780G at 500, and if math is your forté, you can probably guess that the new one runs at 700MHz. Purely coincidence, but it is a nice thing to point out. This should bump the the 3DMark06 scores from the mid-1600s to the low- to mid-2000s. For an integrated GPU, that is a stunning achievement.
If you add in Sideport memory – basically an on board 64 or 128M DDR2 or DDR3 chip in either 64 or 128 bit width – this should add an even larger chunk to the score. A local frame buffer saves an immense amount of travel to and from main memory, and can be used to more aggressively put the memory controller to sleep while keeping video active. This is one of those power tweaks we mentioned earlier.
The GPU itself is basically an ATI RV610 core. It has all 40 shaders of the older 34x0 GPU, along with AVIVO HD and UVD. It can hardware decode all HD codecs currently in use, and saddle anyone dumb enough to buy a Blu-Ray drive with all the crushing DRM that platform has to offer. The video outs can have DVI, VGA, HDMI and Displayport, pick any two to be active at any time.
There are also 22 PCIe2 lanes, most commonly found in a 2 8x and up to 6 1x config. Four more are used to connect the SB750 south bridge. This SB brings 6 SATA2 channels, one PATA, 12 USB2.0, PCI and HD audio. Nothing special there, but lurking beneath the surface, there is a lot of goodness.
The major upgrade from the SB700 to the SB750 is simple, it adds RAID5 to the mix. With 6 SATA channels, this could have some major opportunities, especially for a home cinema box with a few 1.5TB drives slapped on it. To make this much simpler, ATI threw in a completely revamped Raid control panel to make life simpler.
More importantly than that, another one of the new features is called ACC, or Advanced Clock Calibration. To the buzzword averse, this brings something quite interesting to the table: a communications channel from the SB750 to the CPU, basically a tweaking path and feedback loop. What it does is allow all the boot setting and some of the usually factory-set fuses to be overridden and reprogrammed if you have an unlocked CPU.
ACC may not sound like much, and it is most definitely not a user-controllable option, but it should help. What it does is allow flexibility and remove hidden bottlenecks. If you crank up the main CPU voltage, you may or may not be changing several other voltages and clocks on the CPU that very well could limit the performance in a spectacular way. With luck, ACC will break this glass ceiling by changing the settings you can't automatically.
The early 780Gs were not meant for the insane overclocker set, and even though they had a lot of options to fiddle with, they lacked one big must-have: power delivery. The 780G we reviewed in March simply would not boot with a prototype Phenom 2.6GHz/9950. That chip drew 140W, and the humble 780G board would not even post with the CPU in.
The new 790GX takes that into account, and provides full power for 140W CPUs and more should you chose to play with the AMD Overdrive utility.
Speaking of which, there is a completely revamped AMD Overdrive program that launches with the 790GX. It is black and green instead of the older more staid color scheme, and quite simply looks a lot better. If you have a newish AMD box, go grab it here, it is well worth the price.
In the end, the 790GX is simply a 780G with a lot of tweaks, features, and RAID5. The base part was so damn good that it is hard to find things to improve. More speed is always a good thing, as is power savings and potentially a few more MHz from your CPU. Hard to argue any of those bullet points.
The only down side is cost. 780G boards run from about $80 to $110, 790GX boards are $100 to $150, but both prices will fall a bit as soon as they are out for a bit. The low end 790GX boards are a pretty solid deal, and the high end ones are quite feature packed, but a bit hard to justify the added price. If you want a home theater box with local storage, RAID5 is mighty valuable.
Building a system piecemeal and want to end up with a higher end crossfire box? Again, the 790GX is a great starting point.
For everything else, there is the 780G, and that is not exactly a bad system. The only competition to the 790GX is it's little brother, in some ways a great problem for AMD to have, and in others, the worst of both worlds.
Bottom line, the consumer wins, there is a wider spectrum of choices on the market, and that is never a bad thing.
Hard to fault more and better.µ
I heard that you can't run two digital output in the same time ( like DVI & HDMI ), so you can use VGA + any other Digital output ( DVI, HDMI, DP )
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-integrated-790gx,1988-14.html
"Perhaps, but Nvidia also offers HybridPower for saving energy, even with a couple of power-hungry GPUs installed. AMD’s core logic is missing that interaction, which we think is critical if you hope to sell onboard graphics to high-end buyers."
Thats good I was hoping there would be a chipset to fill in the gap between the 780G and 790fx (790x doesn't count).

Now all the nVidiots you pissed off are gonna acuse you of AMD bumming and so on and completely overlook a good product...... sigh.....
AMD is at 20 year LOW & continuing in Tort against Intel for making too many of 36 billion $ of X86 market.

So far 1.5 million pages of year 2000-2005 are assembled, it's be 138 mile high stack of paper. That mean, ole Intel actually Bought products from potential AMD customers & then refused payment if company bought AMD.

Its Nice to See AMD make wide appeal & use board with such Power inside.although final result is bit ordinaryly integratedly NOT so High of 3d numbers, Processor is behemouth, so just coraling beast is something good.
drashek
Intel's GMA X4500 in the G45 may not break any records, but it is certainly catching up.

http://www.hkepc.com/?id=1510&page=5&fs=idn#view

On early drivers, it's consistently anywhere from 19% to 228% faster than the GMA X3500 in actual games. And only 10-30% slower than the AMD 780G. Admittedly in the comparison, the Q6600 is stronger than the X4 9750, but with Intel's price drops, they are pretty much the same price now so I think it's valid.

In any case, the 790GX ensures AMD keeps it's IGP lead over the GMA X4500 and may even be a response to it.
To tell you the truth, the lack of RAID 5 was one of my only drawbacks to purchasing an AMD chipset. With that bottleneck gone and better performance, NVIDIA is going to be hurting in the chipset department for the next 6-18months.

And who knows, maybe they saw the writing on the wall and did actually decide to exit the chipset business. Only they can't actually confirm that because their exit would issued prematurely by customers refusing to purchase a product that is essentually dead and you "still" can't get support for.
We have been watching this processor close at our office <a href="http://3tpro.com">Dallas Computer Consulting</a>. Thanks for the post
That was a great article, Charlie. A nice change from all of the nvidia bashing of late.
Will "E" Will,

While I appreciate that seeing 'raid5' written on a motherboard's box may inspire some awe. 99% of those motherboards come with what's called 'fakeraid'.
They do nothing to actually speed up the raid calculations they just provide a nice bios screen to put some metadata on the drives. All the raid logic is handled in the drivers.
A good way of telling weather or not there is an open-source Linux driver for the raidset on the motherboard, as fakeraid cards don't have them. (They are handled by exactly the same code as 'software raid' on Linux)
Marvell, for instance markets a 'raid card' that's just an ordinary sata card with a raid-like bios. It has properietary Linux drivers on it's website to read the metadata.

On a sidenote, because this raid metadata is properietary, it is very difficult to migrate your raidset from one motherboard to the next. On the 'cheap' motherboards (anything less than a beefy tyan server board) it's much better to let your OS handle the raid for you. This way, you'll get much better portability of your disks across upgrades.

Don't believe the hype! ;)
Too bad you can't put a Core2 in there, huh?
just so long as you use a good compiler that isn't made by Intel or someone bribed by Intel. Code that's tweaked to run on AMDs absolutely screams on AMDs, compared to code that's tweaked for Intel that runs pretty good on Intel. The problem is that since Intel is about 90% of the high-end market, code is written for Intel.

Phenoms are the better chips, but everybody wants to get in bed with Intel, so AMD suffers. That's why I own 200 shares of AMD stock, bought with a huge chunk of my paycheck. I have paranoid schizophrenia, so my ability to perform tasks fluctuates enough that a well-paying steady job isn't possible. 120 average tested IQ, and I'm working as a bus-boy at KFC because I can't trust my own perceptions of the physical world.

That's why I'm supporting AMD, because Intel is a POS parasitic corporation and I love to support a deserving underdog.