Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Warrant needed to look at staff messages

Employers need to make privacy change
Friday, 20 June 2008, 07:52

EMPLOYERS IN THE US will be frantically changing their privacy policies after the Appeals court told them they would need a warrant or the employee's permission to see messages that aren't stored on site.

The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, has ruled that employers cannot look on their employee's wireless devices to see what emails or messages are stored there.

A lower court had said employers can look at text messages because they're stored by the outside contractors. The 9th Circuit ruled that since employers are paying only for messaging services they do not have access to their employee's mails.

Practically it means that employers will need to get an employee's written permission to access messages.

Joel Reidenberg, a professor at the Fordham University School of Law and an expert on information privacy law told AP that a ruling like this is going to force companies to be more careful in their data management.

The ruling is as a result of a lawsuit filed by police officers in the Southern California city of Ontario. The coppers claim that the police department illegally examined text messages they sent from work-issued pagers.

The officers argued that the department shouldn't have been able to view the messages without their approval or a court order. ยต

L'Inq
AP

Share this:

Comments
blackberry server

RIM best get an updated package out quick then. There BES for novell stores all the text messages sent and recieved in plain text on the server! I have no idea why it even does it!

posted by : tom, 20 June 2008 Complain about this comment
Dicks in good company

The people who deny our right of privacy are no better than the STASI was.

posted by : A Private Message, 20 June 2008 Complain about this comment
I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today

---
"Shutup and sign on the blanket line".

Hmmm, must be some sort of a Verification code, I says.

posted by : Karlsbad Beefwellington , 21 June 2008 Complain about this comment
It's legal, then:

1. Anyone Not Signing Permission Is No Longer Employed.

2. All Employees Must Use Assigned Cellphones/PDAs for personal Communications
( plans / package deals )

3. pretending that those who assume all rights & authority are worse/inferior, when you want to be one, & emulate them when you are in position of authority, changes nothing!

posted by : Captain Obvious, 22 June 2008 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?