The Inquirer-Home

Novell wins Unix victory over SCO

Not court in the act
Sat Aug 11 2007, 09:22
THE JUDGE presiding over the SCO v. Novell slander of title lawsuit has issued a flurry of partial summary judgement rulings that must be viewed as crushing defeats for SCO.

In a 102 page order (PDF), Utah Federal District Court Judge Dale A. Kimball decided numerous motions for summary judgement that had been flung on his desk by both sides. The most significant of these rulings are, in effect, that:

Novell owns the UNIX SVRX and UnixWare copyrights; Novell has the right, at its sole discretion, to direct SCO to waive its claims against IBM and Sequent; and SCO owes Novell payment for the UNIX SVRX licences it sold to Microsoft and Sun.

The judge also dismissed SCO's slander of title, non-compete and unfair competition claims against Novell, but left at issue for trial Novell's cross-claim against SCO for slander of title. However, he declined to grant Novell's request for a constructive trust confiscating SCO's assets to cover SCO's SVRX licence liabilities, because the actual amount at stake is a factual issue yet to be determined.

Thus SCO v. Novell might still go to trial in about six weeks or so, unless of course the parties settle out of court before then. But now, following these summary judgement rulings, the trial will be all about Novell's claim of SCO's slander of title, how much SCO owes Novell for having sold those SVRX licences to Microsoft and Sun, and possibly how much in punitive damages a jury might want SCO to pay.

Joe LaSala, Novell's senior vice president and general counsel, released the following statement about the rulings on Novell's PR blog:

"In the spring of 2003, Novell set out to ensure that SCO's groundless claims would not interfere with the development of Linux. Today's court ruling vindicates the position Novell has taken since the inception of the dispute with SCO, and it settles the issue of who owns the copyrights of UNIX in Novell's favor. The court's ruling has cut out the core of SCO's case and, as a result, eliminates SCO's threat to the Linux community based upon allegations of copyright infringement of UNIX. We are extremely pleased with the outcome."

The second summary judgement ruling listed above in SCO v. Novell will likely also have devastating knock-on effects on bad boy SCO's claims in the SCO v. IBM lawsuit which is scheduled to go to trial later. µ

L'INQS
Groklaw
New York Times

Share this:

Comments
Are you little confused about COPYRIGHTS ...

GETTING CONFUSED about COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ...

Take a look at this enlightening funny video that explains COPYRIGHT protections.

IF YOU LOVE LINUX OR IF LINUX HAS MADE YOU A BETTER GLOBALIZED COMPANY OR PERSON PLEASE INVIST 10 MINUTS OF YOUR LOVELY LIFE, BECAUSE AS NOVELL ALSO HAD MADE A TWO YEARS PREVIOUS AGREEMENT WITH MICROSOFT AND ONE OF THE TOPICS OF THIS AGREEMENT IS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION FOR LINUX USERS.

NOW OUR LINUX IS SAP READY !!!
NOW OUR LINUX IS MAINFRAME READY !!!
NOW OUR LINUX IS DATACENTER READY !!!
NOW OUR LINUX IS ENTERPRISE BUSINESS READY !!!

AND YOU...
ARE YOU READY FOR LINUX !!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyUs8F4m5bM

posted by : Carlos Ribeiro, 01 April 2010 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?