Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Intel updates processor prices

Launches new Celeron D
Monday, 1 September 2008, 18:04

INTEL HAS UPDATED its pricing list to include low-cost quad-cores, Core 2 Duo desktop processors and a new Celeron D.

The quad-core Q8200, listed at an affordable $224, is a 45-nanometer processor with a clock speed of 2.33GHz and 4MB of cache memory. The low-cost chip is capable of a front-side bus speed of 1333 MHz.

The new E5200 Core 2 Duo processor, priced at $84, has a core clock speed of 2.5GHz, 2MB of cache memory, and an 800MHz front-side bus.

Intel has also listed a new Celeron D processor for $53. The Celeron D, which runs at 2.2GHz, has 512K of cache memory and an 800MHz front-side bus. µ

Share this:

Comments
who's wrong?

On the Intel site, the E5200 is NOT a Core 2 Duo, it is a Pentium Dual Core...

But everyone is reporting it as a Core 2 Duo... 

http://compare.intel.com/PCC/default.aspx?familyid=1&culture=en-US

What gives?

posted by : Jean Chevreuil, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
@who's wrong

The Pentium Dual Core brand is reserved for that value members of the Core 2 Duo family. The CPU architecture is the same as Core 2 Duo: the differences are brand and cache size. Apparenly there are a lot of people in the world to whom the word "Pentium" means something positive. This brand is for those guys.

posted by : Compeng, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
RE: who's wrong?

They're pretty much the same thing - the Pentium Dual Cores are just Core 2s with less cache and perform pretty much identically relative to clock speed. Particularly the E5200 which has the same amount of cache and such as the E4000 series. It doesn't really matter either way.

posted by : Lightnix, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Price list says C2D

The latest price list (http://www.intc.com/priceList.cfm) calls it a Core 2 Duo. :shrug:

posted by : Paul, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Mostly Wrong

Not to mention the recent advertising farce where Core 2 Quad CPUs are being reported as Quad Core CPUs. Get your facts straight morons', a Quad Core has FOUR processing cores, while a Core 2 Quad has 4 x the cache of a normal Core 2.


posted by : Dane, 01 September 2008 Complain about this comment
dumbdumbs

Where's that post?
What idiot said Core2 Quads were dual cores with 4X the cache? Go back to your ebay wars you idiot!

posted by : Louis, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Dane - How can you be so wrong?

I find it hilarious when someone like Dane feels the need to shout about how wrong others are, while having his facts completely screwy. 


posted by : truth, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
danes vane

wow Dane, you're a geeks hero. You must be proud knowing your quads from your duo caches et el. . . . ;)

posted by : Mehere, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
@Mostly Wrong

Uh.....no. I have a Core 2 Quad, and it does in fact have 4 cores.

posted by : Neomega, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Cores

Dane, a core 2 quad actually DOES have 4 cores!

posted by : Justin, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
@who's wrong

The Pentium Dual Core range are low end Core 2s (which are much faster than the old Pentium Ds) that use the Pentium D power regulation and pin layout making them compatible with older motherboards.

posted by : JDocs, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Dane your are wrong

Dane save your misinformed comments for somewhere else, not a tech tabloid mate.

Core 2 Quads are indeed Quad Core as they have 4 processors. The don't have 4x the cache of the Core 2's, they have 2x the cache, as a Core Quads are basically two Core 2's thrown together on the same package.

Yes, they have 4x the cache or one of the mid-range series or even 12x the cache of the low-end models, or compared to the 65nm series they have 1.5x the cache in the new 45nm 

Easy to be confused, think Intel makes it confusing on purpose. Personally the Pentium Dual Core serves me fine. The E2180 was dirt-cheap and have got to 3Ghz on stock, and doesn't 'feel' all that different to a E8400 - sure, benchmarks are much better, but due to not much difference in real world usage, isn't worth the extra £100.

Now the E5200 looks *very* interesting. High multiplier, 2.5Ghz stock...

New overclockers favourite ?!?

posted by : Docfonz, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Dane: stop smoking chronic

Core 2 Quad ARE quad-core CPUs (well, tecvhnically they're two dual-core CPUs bonded together), but all in all they do have four cores.

Be careful with the weed, bro.

posted by : Intelliguy, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Value

I've always been an AMD user and I always will be most likely.

Given the state of today's economy, value is often more important than price.

For us non gaming, overtly value-conscious buyers, an AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Brisbane @ $66 with cooler is high value.

Cut my encoding time by 67% and I still have enough money in my pocket to take my bride out for a great anniversary evening.

posted by : Doug Glass, 02 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?