The Inquirer-Home

Never use an Intel deposition to end a sentence with

AMD antitrust saga grinds on
Wed Apr 11 2007, 10:10
LAWYERS FOR AMD said they would take Intel's deposition on preservation of documents.

This preposition for a deposition means that an Intel person must provide testimony under oath although it doesn't have to be made in court, but in chambers, as we Brits have it.

AMD explained that this step is part of the discovery process and will let it and the class plaintiffs respond to Chipzilla's disclosures.

Intel gets to choose who the appropriate witnesses are - so we suspect we won't be seeing Sean Maloney and Paul Otellini a-testifying in front of Justice Hoseph Farnan. µ

Share this:

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?