The Inquirer-Home

Spam is free speech, claims spammer

Anti-spam law challenged
Thu Sep 13 2007, 08:37
ONE OF THE TOP ten spammers in the world is claiming that anti-spam laws are interfering with his free speech.

According to ZDNet, Jeremy Jaynes of Raleigh, is in the dock appealing Virginia's law banning spam.

He was convicted and sentenced to nine years in prison but is appealing on the grounds that the law is unconstitutional.

Jaynes, used aliases and false Internet addresses, bombarded Web users with junk e-mails peddling sham products and services.

Jaynes' lawyer, Thomas Wolf said that while there was no question spam can be regulated, Virginia's statute attached severe criminal penalties to unsolicited bulk e-mail of a noncommercial nature.

Under the First Amendment, anonymous speech was protected and a person anywhere in the world sending anonymous political or religious e-mails in bulk could unwittingly break the law because some of the messages almost certainly would pass through servers in Virginia.

However State Solicitor General William Thro said the anti-spam law did not stop free speech it just prevented people falsifying Internet routing and transmission information to electronically trespass on a privately owned computer network. µ

Share this:

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?