Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

AMD veep remains optimistic

Rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic
Tuesday, 8 April 2008, 08:40

YOU MIGHT THINK THAT Randy Allen, AMD server and workstation vice president, would not have much to smile about after his company was forced to delay its official launch of quad-core server chips back in 2007, but you’d be wrong. In an interview with ITWeek, Allen spoke in depth about the reasons for the delay, AMD’s plans for imminent re-launch, and his optimism for staying ahead of Intel’s game.

Allen told ITWeek that AMD was just preparing to ship out its first quad-core Opteron parts, codenamed Barcelona, whose launch had been frozen in September 2007 due to problems with their translation look aside buffers (TLB) in the L3 cache shared between all the cores on the chip. This could have potentially led to systems crashes, which made AMD feel it would be better advised “to delay a quarter, which is what happens if you have to make a change in the silicon,” said Allen.

Perhaps slightly surprising and not particularly credibly in light of the facts (AMD yesterday confirmed that they were to cull a whopping ten per cent of its workforce and that numbers were 15 per cent down this quarter from Q4 2007) Allen reckons that the company didn’t endure too serious a loss from the delay, claiming that market share had been retained, but that the incident had bruised their ego a bit.

Allen points to AMD’s “rock solid” lead in the four-socket server space, and the company’s growth in the single-socket business throughout 2007. In fact, the only decline, according to Allen, was in the two-socket space, which he blamed on Intel’s new quad-core chips, unveiled in the last quarter of 2007.

Explaining why he felt AMD still had the edge over their main competition, Allen pointed to AMD’s focus on ensuring that customers got more performance per Watt on products, that their platform was inherently stable and that they were still miles ahead in the field of virtualisation. Indeed, Barcelona allows customers to upgrade their existing servers for higher performance ones, without having to provide more power or more cooling.

Rivalry with Intel remains bitter though. Chipzilla unleashed its quad-core Xeons for multi-processor systems to coincide with AMD’s Barcelona launch in 2007. The company has also since unveiled their new 45nm quad-core chips and have announced an upcoming six-core Xeon. To make matters worse, Intel has said it will introduce its first chips based on the Nehalem multi-core architecture, the biggest competition to AMD’s chips, by the end of this year.

However, despite the fact that Nehalem seems to be similar to AMD’s Opteron in terms of each chip getting its own source of directly connected memory, the Barcelona design does have advantages in that each of its processor cores can be clocked down independently of the others. It also has something called Rapid Virtualisation Indexing which provides hardware support for mapping virtual machine memory to physical memory, boosting virtual workload performance.

Also, better late than never, AMD plans to level the playing field with its rival Intel again in the second half of 2008, when it launches its first processors manufactured using a 45nm process, followed by eight-core chips sometime in 2009.

Apparently the company’s first 45nm chip, dubbed Shanghai, will include a 6MB L3 cache, a significant upgrade from the 2MB of Barcelona, and will also give more instructions per clock cycle.

Allen said that in the future, AMD’s structure would expand to make way for eight and more core chips to be used in data centres. But currently, Allen’s main focus is shipping the new quad-core chips, which the company hopes can put them back in the race again. µ

L’Inq
ITWeek

Share this:

Comments
Hope

Personally, I would simply like to see AMD hang on long enough to get the sought after, big pay-out, that intel owes for anti competitive practices.

posted by : Someone Special, 08 April 2008 Complain about this comment
There is Cure.

Intel is Better is like Nog Hairs From DEAD are Tastee. IBM is AMD Prime Competitor In OCTO. Cure is Simple, Now that Chartered Deals With AMD, Kidnap Chartered President. 1.5 mil & its' YOURS.

Glad I finally Understand that TLB thing, I knew it would be tough to make cores talk amoung themselves. It CRASHES Cores, Not entire system, So Far. Yet Time is Money & Time Well Spent is More Mo Money.

Just Running entire Universe in Parallel isn't enough, Its Childs Roadmap Game. Making Code Interact with Dynamic Enviorment is GOD. So take that i bm(get it, BM) hahaha. oh, well. Did I tell you my moms name is Barbra Mae? get it, BM, Mom Hates That.

Theres certain things you have to live with, & ANOS Plan is one, Year Late, Yet Year Ahead is Octo. So Be It.
Hey-Don't Step On My AMD Stock, Its' OCTO Too. My Lucky Number OCTO. Anyone Whom Claims its 7 is Gambler.
Using 4 cores Wisely is Four Times More, No Other Way Around it. Feeding that Monster Costs' Extra.
T. Drashek

posted by : Octo_Quad, 08 April 2008 Complain about this comment
STOPPPP!!!

STOP IT STOPP IT!!!!
Dosn't the INQ have moderators? Why are these people allowed to post such idiotic and illegible comments. Please block these persons comments, Octo_Quad i'm looking at you.

posted by : DeadSouL, 08 April 2008 Complain about this comment
Hmmm

I'd have to concur with DeadSoul, some of these comments give a mild concussion. Prehap's The Inq should hire some of the Chinese government to be your mods....

posted by : Valhalla, 09 January 2008 Complain about this comment
T. Drashek is a bot

C'mon, he has to be... And now my spoof of him (it).

AMD is feathers to pluck Intel's rooster. Only superman drinks the alligator mess. Helmets will just open the gate, and transistors will fall from the pudding like they are poodles. Kicking Pat needs a tumor to release the cores and give Hector his itch, but where is the lotion? I'll tell you, it is in a sterno jar on Funk and Wagnell's porch. Now I go to sell my toenails for crack.

posted by : Snuke, 08 April 2008 Complain about this comment
If you could see

Ultie's site, the whole site, then you might understand.

posted by : His Exigency, 08 April 2008 Complain about this comment
Actually,

I actually come here to see what Von Drashek has to say about the world today.

I spend hours pondering the meaning of his scribble.

After all this time I finally figured him out, and when you do, boy... TMTA!

No, really his posts are total garbage, but if you actually come to the Inq for news then, well, that is your problem right there.

I think it is great that the Inq is 'free as a bird'.

posted by : notsobad, 09 April 2008 Complain about this comment
l0l

haha omg that was like as good or better than von drashek!
T von drashek is now redundant
but u gotta admit he makes me laugh everyday!

posted by : Chris, 09 April 2008 Complain about this comment
Alien Messengers/Foreign AIgents/Spooksville Live Jive?

"Just Running entire Universe in Parallel isn't enough, Its Childs Roadmap Game. Making Code Interact with Dynamic Enviorment is GOD. So take that i bm(get it, BM) hahaha. oh, well. Did I tell you my moms name is Barbra Mae? get it, BM, Mom Hates That. "...... posted by : Octo_Quad, 08 April 2008 

Quit fannying around, Octo_Quad. I'll call your hand and raise IT to see if you're bluffing. A Childs Roadmap Game, IT may most definitely be, but do you have the Virtualisation Knack of Making Code/Codes/CodeXXXX Interact with Dynamic Environments for GODly Work, Rest and Play.

amfM HyperRadioProActivity ....a QuITe XXXXotic Teutonic Discipline for Global Operating Devices .....Astute SuperSubAtomic NEUKlearer Processors of BIOS into Quantum IntelAIgents has the Knack/Crack/Hack to Crank out NeuReal Codes for Future Realisation ..... from the Virtualised Clouds with their ESPecialised EMPathies in Parallel Multi-Dimensional Multi-Cored IDEntities........ CyberIntelAIgently Designed Entities.

As you will have to Imagine, such would only be the tip of the niceberg. I Kid U Not.

DeadSouL, Steganography is not just, or even, idiotic and illegible comments. They are valid security carriers of globally significant Information.



posted by : amanfromMars, 09 April 2008 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?