Oliver Cromwell was hanged and decapitated two years after he had died
YESTERDAY INTEL began shipping its X-25E Extreme SATA SSD, said to be its highest-performing solid-state drives available for servers, workstations, and storage systems.
Featuring 50-nanometer single-level cell NAND flash memory technology, the X25E Extreme apparently bangs out 35,000 read input/output operations (IOPS) a second and 3,300 write IOPS with a read latency of 75 microseconds.
Intel reckons its small, 2.5 inch SSD packs 100 times more performance than hard disk drives (in IOPS) and since it has no moving parts, it can purportedly lower energy costs by up to five times. Chipzilla also says the little drives are more reliable than the hard kind, but the catch is, they’re also much, much more expensive.
The X25E Extreme was apparently designed with intense computing workloads in mind and consumes 2.4 watts, putting out 14,000 IOPS per watt. More specs for the 32 GB Intel X-25E SATA SSD include 35,000 IOPS (4KB Random Read), 3,300 IOPS (4KB Random Write) and 75 microsecond read latency. The device also supposedly achieves up to 250 MB per second of sequential read speeds and up to 170 MB per second sequential write speeds.
The 32-GB version, shipping now, currently costs $695 in quantities up to 1,000 and Intel says it will start shipping samples of a 64-GB SSD to computer makers this quarter.
Intel reckons the 32-GB drive can write up to 4 PB of data over three years before it needs to be replaced, while the 64-GB version will be able to write up to double the data during the same time frame.
Chipzilla aren’t the only ones in the SSD market, however, and Samsung Electronics just recently announced its 32-GB and 64-GB drives would be bunged into HP’s ProLiant BL495c virtualisation blade server, so Intel needs to watch its back.
Still, until the price of SSDs comes down quite a lot, it doesn’t look like it’s worth getting in too much of a state about anything. µ
Saw Last Months High Perf Desktoppers & for mere$9k can get prebuilt in same SSD speed. Its Revoulution in doing. of 8 listed machines, mentions SSD & double speed Scores. Wow. Its Acoming, Martha, Its' Acoming!

Now for SAD News, After Nearly year of Malicious software removal from Microdates HardTuesday, I find out I had Zlog Virus. What Whimp, I cried for two hours.

SSE4.2 adds 7 inst, usb 3 & finally on 17th of thanksgiving: Retail Nahalem+, Nahalem & lynnhalem, for short tuffed.

Ram Adamndingdong in GDDR5, plus SSD of this Magnatuide & its' ULTEE' Time.
Errr,Captn', Geton Time Burger Afrying!aitsham.
STeWie drashek
Its the high tech sectors dirty little secret but I pose the question to the rest of you. How long will it take the competition to reverse engineer these?
This is a paradigm. Imagine working with HDDs that operated at such-and-such speed. Now, you plug in this-and-that-SSD that operates with IO at, say, 2-4x than a spindle.

Now. Sit back and watch the OS and drivers crumble. Through-put was never like this. Though SSD introduces exciting advances, its advances are its Achilles. No testing; no verification. Faster and un-validated still sucks next to slower and dependable when it comes to mission critical data.

Err, yes it was. I have a little raid chassis (internal hardware controller, presents as a single disk) which shoves 500 megabytes/sec through without problems. The novelty here is size, performance per watt and latency. The throughput is absolutely not unprecedented. You fail, too bad you've never used grown-up hardware.