It was not caveated [TurnVerbsIntoNounsWatch] - John Reid, UK Health Minister
AMD INSISTS that Shanghai, its next generation of server-centric processor chips, won't be plagued by the same problems that hampered its roll-out of Barcelona, damaging the company's reputation and profitability.
The world's second largest chip shop admitted that it had made huge mistakes getting Barcelona to market, and that production cock-ups and core limitations delayed the launch by up to eight months.
As AMD's Pat Patla told Cnet, "We had some mis-starts in getting Barcelona to market and wanted to bring as much velocity to Shanghai as possible. Learn from our mistakes and, as a company, never do that again,"
And if AMD is ever to regain its place at the top of the processor heap, it needs Shanghai to roll out, and more importantly, work, flawlessly. Not least because the server market is currently the only sector in which the company turns a decent profit.
So AMD has assigned an unnamed lead engineer to take over the entire Shanghai project, and Patla has promised to make sure that the product AMD hands over to its partners is of substantial stability so that they can do lots of early validation.
"We're in full production right now in the factory," he said. "People will start getting first silicon from the final production very shortly."
Which all means that the original launch scheduled for Q1 of 2009 now looks like it will happen in Q4 of 2008. Perhaps AMD was being overly cautious after the disaster that was Barcelona, and have now realised that it doesn't need the extra time.
Let's hope the folks at AMD are right because, if this one goes the same way as Barcelona did, there will be hell to pay. ยต
L'Inq
Cnet
I sure hope I can plop a 45nm 3.0GHz Phemom X4 in my motherboard which supports only up to a TDP of 95W in 2009.
Let's hope so. The tech world is a better place by far with a strong AMD.
AMD can deliver for this and Denab I am waiting on Denab as I am thinking about upgrading from Sk939.

I stick with AMD because I have used them from K-6 III but my Sk939 was only build last year. And my Sk A was 2 years before that I am always behind on system because of the prices you can get parts at there's just crazy to pass on.
amd is somewhere close to number 10. 
-there is no way amd can compete in broad range of products. One segment may be ok.
Unless this "unnamed" engineer is Tony Stark, I doubt AMD will regain much ground even if the production and roll-out of Shanghai is perfect.
is BaronMatrix, that twit!?

Oh, he's in the bathroom having a personal moment.
Well I hope so. If the competition is not strong, it'll be Intel dictating the prices and mosying along leisurely in the performance arena, like it was doing when AMD delivered the Athlon Ghz kick in its rear that it needed.
I'm all-Intel, dual and quad core, at the moment, but I'll be happy to buy an AMD chip if it's worth it performance-wise.
I want more performance all the time. I'll buy from anyone who can deliver.
So deliver, AMD !