Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

How to turn an old fab into a solar plant

Semicon West 2008 Six months and 200 million Euros
Sunday, 20 July 2008, 14:15

WHAT DO YOU do with an old shuttered fab that no one wants anymore? Easy, convert into a solar plant that is in high demand.

That is what Dockweiler Solar did to the old Communicant .13µ fab near Frankfurt, Germany. It took less than six month to convert it to a solar fab for Conergy, a solar production company. It will now produce wafers and modules in one building, saving time and transport costs.

The end result took a two-storey fab with a lot of columns and ended up with a three-storey building with a column-free clean room on the top floor. In the end, there were 42,500 square metres of floor space and 250MW of panel production capacity.

alt='factory_demo'
Don't ptretend you have never wanted to try this!

Solar production requires less height than electronics, so the decision was made to spit the two floors into three. This meant jackhammering out the middle floor and adding two more. Then you remove the columns from the top, and move in equipment. The end result looks like this:

alt='solar_conversion_fab'
One floor, 70M Euros

The idea is simple, you make the cells on the big, open and column-free top floor then move them downstairs to package them into modules. The middle floor distributes power, gases, liquids and consumables, so everything is tidy and convenient. Things that don't need to be in clean areas are not, things that do, are. Quite simple and nice if done right.

Dockweiler was a part of this because the firm makes tubing systems, and has a rather interesting crimp-fit system that takes two pipes, a converted drill, and a crimpable connector.

Since solar panel production does not need many of the exotic chemicals that silicon does, they can get away with much cheaper and easier to manufacture infrastructure.

alt='pipe_crimper'
Every geek needs one

Solar manufacture is also a fairly well-known technology. There is little R&D to be done at this point in the factories. This means you set up the line, work the bugs out, and crank out panels. If there is new technology, it is researched elsewhere and put in place when it is ready for volume.

Another thing to think about is that many solar factories are pilots for plants that will be built in the third world, the idea being to make panels where they are needed and used. This means the simpler the construction techniques and materials used, the better. That is one reason Dockweiler is in the solar game, an untrained person with a hand tool costs a lot less than an orbital welding machine and operator.

In the end, turning the old Communicant fab into the Conergy solar fab took less than five months, in the middle of a German winter, measured from start to equipment move-in date. From there, it was another six weeks until final completion. The building went from 29K wafers per month to 250MW of solar capacity in about half a year.

The campus has room for more fabs, and there are three more planned for a total of about a GW of capacity. The total budget for the Conergy fab was about 200 million Euros, including equipment and all the cell lines. Construction and building related portions of this took about 70 million Euros. µ

Share this:

Comments
Expensive?

"Construction and building related portions of this took about 70 million Euros."
Is €1647 per m² not expensive, just to convert a factory?

posted by : Miser, 20 July 2008 Complain about this comment
So maybe that's AMD's game plan

1) Convert one of AMD's two Dresden fabs to solar production

2) Build a replacement chip fab in New York

3) Profit! 

Hey, it's no crazier than anything the "analysts" have come up with.

posted by : InvestorEngineer, 20 July 2008 Complain about this comment
BAD MATH.

Theres Improvement & then theres just Change.Theres all sorts of "BUZZ" Words that are sold, like infinite number of transmission gears, all unique, yet all doing same fundumental task. What could replace them? NO Clue. Future Is NOT Easy to Predict, especially if its entire new technology, Mind just comes up Blankie.

Here MATH Says it all. 8,000 hr=year X 60 Minutes= 500,000 gal year fuel at 1 gal minute, Huge consumption, yet cost of Plant Mickey Mouse is 100 years of that level Fuel Useage in One BiIG $Dump. 
NO Wonder AMD Is Losing Monies. They'll Need PAY Toilets Next.

Noticed Msr. Magee Posted to it.examiner on Friday, Mr. Ruiz, I Missed Meeting two years ago in Dc Convention Ctr & often Wished I had Meet Hector. Probably did more for quality computing than any single name at Present. 
It is funny coming from WANG, DEC Nassua & likes, strictly large scale business, to come up with such Radical New Desktop Ideas. For $200 Million AMD Should have bought another HECToR.
STeWie Drashek

posted by : Tank_Farm_Ultie, 20 July 2008 Complain about this comment
per month?

Sorry if this sounds stupid, but does this article suggest that the plant will eventually be producing a GW of panels per month?
Considering the large coal plants in Australia produce around 1.5 GW, does this mean that with this solar plant and others, it would be, theoritically at least, to replace coal with solar in a few short years?

posted by : Don, 21 July 2008 Complain about this comment
Another Example

German SolarWorld AG recently did the same thing in Hillsboro, Oregon, when it bought a fabrication plant from the Japanese Komatsu Group in early 2007. The plant had never gone into production for the Japanese group.

posted by : Alan, 22 July 2008 Complain about this comment
Interesting statistics comment

"The building went from 29K wafers per month to 250MW of solar capacity in about half a year."

Let me try your interesting technique for quoting statistics:

"I used to weigh 150 pounds, then my pants size increased by 3 inches."

Wouldn't you say my statistics sentence is absolutely useless? Going from 29K to 250MW tells us nothing about how much production increased.

posted by : Jason Goatcher, 22 July 2008 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Windows 7 impressions

How is windows 7 working out for you?