Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Violent content of Manhunt 2 unlocked

Naked violence back
Friday, 2 November 2007, 08:54

GAME MAKER Take-Two's attempt to censor its violent Manhunt 2 game to get a Entertainment Software Rating Board 'mature' rating has come unstuck.

The censored version of the game, made by Rockstar Games, was released with the lower rating but still had smudged violent content on the disk.

Now a team of hackers have restored most of the banned content in all its genital multilating glory.

Now it seems like they have created another controversy similar to the one where they had a hidden sex scene in their game "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. "

The hackers defeated that blurring on the version of the game for Sony's PlayStation Portable. So far they have not hacked the game for the PS2 or the Nintendo Wii.

Fortunately for Take-Two, the hack does not roll back all the changes that enabled the game to qualify for the "Mature" rating. It also requires some technical expertise and a hacked PSP unit.

That has not stopped 'family protection groups' in the US calling for the game to be banned until the mess is sorted out.

Since the Grand Theft Auto incident, the ratings board has demanded that publishers submit even hidden content for review.

Board spokesman Eliot Mizrachi told Fox News that he is aware of the hacking issue and is looking into it.

More here. µ

Share this:

Comments
What about...

Sims and Sims 2 had anti-blur patches for toilet and shower scenes so you could see the Sims in their full non-genitalia glory. Surely this means that Sims should be resubmitted as Mature or 18?

Gees, get over your selves. A patch such as this is additional and not released by a company so why should the company take the rap for it?

posted by : ArC KaNe, 02 November 2007 Complain about this comment
"Family Protection Groups"

.. what a joke. I can think of two things wrong with the title "Family Protection Groups". Who they're serving certainly isn't families, and what they're doing certainly isn't protecting.

They have this antiquated notion that the government and law is the best (and most important) tool via which to produce a desired result. Apparently they missed such watershed bits of factual information as the failure of the U.S's "War on Drugs" and the persistence of music piracy, not to mention how woefully ineffective the policy of prohibition was, back in the day. Look at abortion, also. In spite of its legality, abortion rates have been falling for at least the past decade. 

History has proven how foolish it is to use the government and laws to thwart and change human behavior. So, too, is it with video games. Parents should be deciding for themselves what their kids can and cannot play. I'd wager the parents are a more effective censor and, beyond that, it's the only place where censorship authority truly belongs.

posted by : Mark Ustby, 02 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Seriously...

So if someone else hacks your game and runs it how it's not intended, it can get a higher rating?

Thats like if someone steals your wallet, you have to pay the police for it.

posted by : DecompStar, 02 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Take off the blindfolds.

The Inquirer has a history of producing articles that imply how hard-done-by the manufacturer of violent videogames are (take note of "Fortunately for Take-Two, the hack does not roll back all the changes that enabled the game to qualify for the "Mature" rating", etc.). That is ridiculous. Obviously, if you're going to create a violent videogame, you should be ready to shoulder the responsibilities of creating and disseminating such a game. It's not as though the videogame makers went ahead with the production whilst blindfolded. Give me a break here.

posted by : Al, 02 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Red cars go faster

Think about it this way.

I buy a blue car paint it red and sell it, then the person who buys it strips the red paint of making it a blue car again. Can that purchaser of the car then complain that I sold them a blue car instead of the advertised red?

Maybe instead of trying to get the game developer is trouble, take action against these hackers.

I wonder if by the time I'm a parent I will be able to do any parenting of my children or just have to pay for their food, clothing etc and let the government tell me what to do with them.

posted by : mzeV, 03 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Browsers

Who will win the next round of browser wars?