The Inquirer-Home

Dell 'Cloud Computing' trademark rejected

What took so long?
Mon Aug 18 2008, 10:00

DELL'S APPLICATION to trademark "Cloud Computing" has apparently been shot down by the US Patent and Trademark Office.

Sam Johnston, a bloke who's been following this on his bog, turned up the USPTO's rejection notice on its website.

A massive PDF file available there says that the USPTO has refused Dell's application in a "non-final" action for two reasons.

First, because "the applied-for mark merely describes a feature and characteristic of applicant's services."

Secondly, because "Cloud Computing" is merely a generic industry term that is "incapable of functioning as a source-identifier for applicant's services."

But what's truly astonishing is that it took the USPTO bureaucracy nearly eighteen months to slap down Dell's attempt to trademark this common computing industry buzzword term. ยต

Share this:

Comments
Astonishing

Given the track record of the USPTO, it's astonishing that it DIDN'T go though!


posted by : Doug Lytle, 18 August 2008 Complain about this comment
Not so long. . .

Actually, Egan, eighteen months for a first response on a trademark application in the USPTO is not at all unusual and is no indication that the Office actually DELIBERATED on the validity of the application for the entire time. Rather, it probably just came to the top of the stack and received the standard rejection that all generic and descriptive marks receive. Dell now has the opportunity to respond with evidence that the mark has acquired secondary meaning with respect to its computing products, a pretty tough road in this case. More likely than not, Dell will probably combine the mark with its corporate name or some other word and or design that are clearly open to trademark and the, once the combination mark has been in use for some time, backtrack and try to sever it later in the hope that it can prove secondary meaning at that time through the extensive use of the combined mark.

posted by : Raymond Cranfill, 19 August 2008 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

48 core processors

What would you use a 48-core processor for?