Intel ordered to produce foreign documents in antitrust case

Discovery extended outside US

By INQUIRER staff

Thu Dec 28 2006, 17:24

THE FEDERAL COURT presiding over AMD's antitrust case against Intel has ordered it to produce documents relating to practices outside the US territory.

The order, made yesterday, follows an earlier finding made by the special master in the case, Vince Poppiti, that recommended to judge Joseph Farnan that the evidence abroad is important as over two thirds of X86 CPUs are sold in computers outside the USA. µ

The INQUIRER review of the year A look back at the big news stories of 2011 Friday, 23 December 2011, 08:00 AM Read more	Ipcom demands that German retailers halt HTC sales Seeking fines and contempt of court, but HTC remains defiant Tuesday, 6 December 2011, 17:49 PM Read more
Intel asks to have antitrust claims dismissed Lawyers argue over technicalities Friday, 28 October 2011, 12:53 PM Read more	DEA plan to ban web sites is unworkable Common sense finally hits the UK Government Friday, 5 August 2011, 15:56 PM Read more
AMD is in trouble, says analyst But we beg to differ Wednesday, 13 July 2011, 15:17 PM Read more	Intel will push Atom beyond Moore's Law to catch up with ARM Hopes for a wider role for its pint sized chip Wednesday, 18 May 2011, 12:17 PM Read more

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.

INQ White papers

Databases

Network management

Security

Service oriented architecture

Storage

INQ Jobs

Technical Analyst - UNIX,

Technical Specialist – Unix...

INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?

Yes, companies should suffer an immediate death penalty upon being accused of copyright infringement.

Yes, the coppers said the company was breaking the law so it must be guilty.

No, the company and the people accused are innocent until proven guilty.

No, the company had millions of customers who have been harmed by having access to their data files cut off.

I don't care, I never used Megaupload anyway.

View other polls

© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093

SEARCH :

Site Credentials:

Business & Technology websites:

Business research resources:

Products:

Investment Market IT websites:

Find out what you are worth:

Salary Calculator

Search for a job:

Recruitment Agency A-Z Directory

Accreditations:

Digital Publisher of the Year 2010

Intel ordered to produce foreign documents in antitrust case

Share this:

RIM Playbook OS 2.0 and Blackberry 7.1 video demo

Nokia Lumia 710 video review