Here's how it fares versus the previous top Intel parts in our usual benchmarks, based on my high end reference configuration - Intel D850EMV2 board with 512 MB PC1066 RDRAM, Nvidia Quadro 4 900 XGL OpenGL graphics and WinXP Pro:
| CPU |
P4 2.8
|
P4 2.53
|
P4 2.4
|
| 3DMark2001SE |
12523
|
11971
|
11808
|
| PCMark2002 CPU |
6829
|
6144
|
5816
|
| PCMark2002 mem |
6246
|
6060
|
5995
|
| Sysmark2002 office |
364
|
339
|
329
|
| Sysmark 2002 internet |
168
|
165
|
161
|
| Sandra Suite | |||
| CPU Dhrystone |
5617
|
4871
|
4623
|
| SSE2 Whetstone |
3468
|
3131
|
2965
|
| Multimedia Int |
10986
|
9997
|
9472
|
| Multimedia FP |
13546
|
12179
|
11553
|
| Memory Int |
3295
|
3311
|
3272
|
| Memory FP |
3286
|
3298
|
3271
|
As you can see, the performance gain is still noticeable, but it gradually tapers off due to greater waiting time for the FSB and memory, and that's even with the fastest memory platform available (at least until the Granite Bay). As The Inq readers know, Intel is expected to top out the Northwood line with a 3.20 GHz part sometime early next year, and that should be the last 533 MHz FSB speed grade - after that, hold on for Prescott...
Unless, maybe, Intel does have a version of Pentium 4 with a 667 MHz FSB just in case the Prescott schedule is upset and low-end "Athlon" Hammer comes out on time and works as advertised - but will that really happen? µ