The Inquirer-Home

Supreme Court agrees to review AT&T case

Anti-competitive practice backed by Bush
Tue Jun 24 2008, 09:41

THE US SUPREME COURT acting at the request of the Bush Administration, has intervened in an ISPs lawsuit which accuses AT&T of anti-competitive practices.

The case is about the wholesale prices AT&T charges for high-speed service to ISPs who then compete with AT&T for retail Internet customers.

AT&T's line is that it does not have to deal with ISPs and that the lawsuit should be thrown out for failing to state a valid legal claim.

However the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled against AT &T. It said that the outfit was setting its wholesale prices so high that ISPs could not compete with it.

The appeals court said that federal courts have recognised such price squeeze scams for 60 years, but that they were normally carried out by guys carrying violin cases called Vinny. µ

L'Inq
AP

Share this:

Comments
AT&T's claim wouldn't be valid if...

If AT&T (SBC) was actually a monopoly, then they would have no right to charge wholesale... probably.

...

posted by : agamemnus, 25 June 2008 Complain about this comment
Never

I would never name my violin case Vinny. Maybe Maria.

SM replies: The curse of the missing comma strikes again...

posted by : Guido, 24 June 2008 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?