All we want at Dixons is for our customers to love us - Senior man at DSG
THE CRÈME DE LA CRÈME of tech society have borrowed Hollywood for the their annual Tech Policy Summit which opened yesterday.
The event brings together all the high-profile technologists, public policy makers and academics who come to discuss such heady subjects as globalisation, immigration, the use of airspace, the protection of intellectual property and the price of skinny lattes.
It all started out with a fair amount of Bush bashing to get the summit into the swing of things. The soon-thankfully-to-be-no-longer President was given a fair amount of stick for having let American technology slide compared to the European and Asian industry. Many techsperts even put the president’s failings down to pure technological incompetence, and called for the next US president to be more tech savvy.
Executive vice president of external affairs at One Economy, Alec Ross, for example, told of his company's labours to bridge the digital divide when they asked the White House if they would float the idea of broadband for public housing. According to Ross, he was knocked back and told that high-speed Internet connections were not essential, and considered a tool only for entertainment. Ross reckons that all the president had to do was sign an order and it would have happened.
Others like Andrew Rasiej, founder of the Personal Democracy Forum and a co-founder of the popular site techPresident, were a lot more blunt in their criticism of the Bush administration, saying "We need a complete reboot of our entire system of governance."
But some disagreed and argued that the President may not have been as bad for Tech as others would like to point out. One such techspert, Tony Perkins, founder and editor of AlwaysOn, technology magazine said that Bush had openly supported the push for more H-1B visas, which would effectively open up US immigration, something for which Silicon Valley has long been lobbying. µ
L’Inq
eweek
I've always questioned why the H1-B needs to be expanded, Why not start hiring the people in the country that are tech. I think it's just to get a cheaper labor force. I happen to know quite a few coders who would relocate for jobs.
According to a White House leaker: "Bush has supported the Tech Republic ever since it asserted its independence when Technoslavakia split. The prez openly supported a Democrat congress which increased the number of visas. Now there's a credit crunch. However the prez plans to stay the course in lobbying congress for even more visas for tech republicans who are in favour of broad bands in the tubes. The President is "The Decider" and not those silicone boobs in Hooraywood. He will decide who gets the reboot if the workers don't want to do the jobs that Americans don't want to do. And this techspurt, Tony Perkins, what is he always on about?"
I agree with Lokey.

I see a great number of job postings for high end tech. positions that offer a ridiculously low amount of money, often 1/4 of what I get for similar positions, and often located in particularly expensive portions of the US. These ads are purpose built to convince a bureaucrat that there are no locals willing/able to do the job so someone can be imported on the cheap.