The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer - Henry Kissinger
WHILE AMERICANS queue up to vote for the elite council who will appoint their president, democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has released a last-minute campaign video outlining his views on technology.
Apparently the video was shot over the weekend, and is probably the first major statement Obama has made on technology since he appointed the music industry and spook friendly Joe Biden as his running mate.
Obama pledges to double federal funding for basic research and implement policies that would "keep the door open for the next generation of startups."
He promised to put more government data online in an Obama administration and "ensure that every American has broadband access."
However there are few of the promises on net neutrality which at the start of Obama’s campaign he was very keen on. Now, it seems that Biden has influenced him to tone down that particular rhetoric.
Biden was the man for which PGP was created because he wanted to create spook-friendly laws. PGP was invented to get around his laws which were spiked as a result.
There was no mention of stopping the RIAA in carrying out its witch hunts either. Biden is also very friendly with the movie studios. µ
L’Inq
Barack Obama’s site
Sure Hon Leibermann says get everybody, everybody except Israeli lead Music industry, i bets.

Hon Sarah, Penthouse Centerfold or Hon Vice President, you Be Judge.

Now on Obama, heres video of Cheech from Comedy Team, Laying itOut on Hon Obama Esq. Hey- Nice Chick Cheech,

http://www.tmz.com/videos?autoplay=true&mediaKey=967b9aae-521c-49af-b8b4-83b6fd21e028

TS Drashek
Man, this guy promises the world with money we don't have, and the people he's taking it from live in the valley. I can't believe that people are this stupid.
Why would anyone benefit others first when he is seeking benefit for himself first? Is it because he declared so [in his attempt to benefit himself first] or is it because he really, really felt that way at that point in time? For those who cannot see past the need to save others or some cause, [that’ll be 99.99% of people then], it would be benevolent to one self to realise that we can only help ourself and not so much others. When a person starts comparing/judging, an act of power acquisition, he can only benefit when he is suitably armed with the realisation of how he, and therefore others, are constructed. When we do not even know why we exist other than to believeor disbelieve blindly, we can only be for or against.

When we are “for”, we are blind to that which devolves and when we are “against”, we are blind to that which is evolutionary. Without exception. Confront any quack and he’ll have no option but to confess that the body cures itself. As such, at least from the physical standpoint, there are no saviours but then almost all become worshippers when quackery seemed to have “cured” them of an illness. The deadlier the illness, the more the gratuity of worship. There isn’t a single [partial] human alive who does not exist solely for his desires first. Witness the “charitables” and their attempts at “buying-back” their soul but only so long as they can keep their loot in order that they can maintain their flow of “charity”. So, when was the last time that The Sun demanded that his charity be recognised, sun worshippers included?

We cannot save or help others in Reality. We can only help our self [to recognised our Self] and only when we have self-realised, will “Nature”/”The Body”/Love/whomsoever-we-deemed-as-the-Saviour has the means to gain access to those around us. Humans are not Truth/Love/Saviour. We are merely the gateways for those aspects. The chasm between a true human and a partial human is probably as wide, if not wider, than the differences which separate a primate and a partial human but in truth, nobody needs to know, uncover or identify which category we belong to [but don’t screws-cum-nutters try]. What is important is that those who allow “divinity” access, [and divinity, like truth/reality, is not what we believe or disbelieve but how we may uncover through repeatable and verifiable experiences, a conditon which mankind has failed and is meant to fail across tha ages until recently], can prove that divinity exists [and such proofs are not through the human minds or achievements]. 

That which is relative can never relate to that which is absolute. When it comes to human mental activities, anything that can happen will happen for such is the realms of relativities and the relative realms are about others [power] and seldom about our self/position-within-reality. When a person talks about helping others, he is merely acquiring power to fuel his relative ideas of truth/reality. 

Change can only come from within and never without. The way to help others is to first help our self and when that has been attained, Truth/Love can gain access to help others attain that same position of introspection and not the casting of sermons, dollars, quackery-of-sorts at others. As we all know but seldom realise, providing comfort is merely damaging the comforted for then, the receipient is being groomed to abandon his ability to value himself. “Give a man a fish ….”, etc.

Cruelty and suffering can lead to devoltion but so is removing the capacity for others to value themselves. If there is no death in reality, which is worse. That which might lasts one lifetime or that which can lead to permanent devolution and the point, once again, is neither belief nor disbelief but how one may uncover through having the desire for Reality and not the desire for the power which lacks truth or vice-versa. The relative realms separate the potential and the kinetic for perpetual confrontation whereas Reality’s aim is to complement them for absoluteness is when a power and its truth are in synchonicity. We cannot teach/preach/convert/convince others. We can only be an example for others’ intelligence to surface and it does not matter if one or all attain their reality so long as Reality exists. Greed exists only to complement/limit fear and only when that is attained, will the message of greed-cum-fear be conveyed/limited/negated.

Throughout evolution, devolution was standing by to collect the merry-go-rounders otherwise also known as saviours and their worshippers. Reality is about Love which is Joy-in-progress and Love has nothing to do with saving, blessing, enriching, opportunising and the myriad of excuses offered by devolution. To really progress/evolve, which costs nothing and is the reason why the body cures itself thereby eliminating the need to be “rich & powerful”/”a chosen few”/”blessedly indulgent”/”privileged”/”technologically advanced”/”first world” and similar mental nonsense, we need to realise our true infrastructure. Self-realisation confers the power of discretion through its illumination by Truth/Reality and not the haphazard collateral damage of mere discrimination of the blind/disbelievers and the blinded/believers. 

When a mental patient finally uncovered and realised that he can cure himself through the negation of self-destruction and self-importance, thereby having no greed nor fear, always forgiving of himself and others thereby having no guilt nor anger because Joy is flowing through him [but not through over-excitement of his opiate receptors], what will become of him and others? What will he then do with the bounties that The Sun is pouring forth daily that amounts to “trillions of dollars” daily? Will it be possible to share and be truly capitalistic and communistic at the same time thereby atoning the true meaning of democracy? The aim of collecting is to collectivise/distribute and not to accumulate which is merely a well hidden self-destruct button. 

Utopia is a product of the minds but Reality, which most have yet to uncover is not. To a primate, the concept of arithmetic is similarly laughable as utopia but not to a human. This chasm of realisation is not about pros and cons. It’s about where one stands relative to Reality/Evolution. As the big man would exhorts, “Well punk, are you ready for the trip of many, many lifetimes?”…Will the answer be, ”Hey man, I’s gottas to knows …” or will perhaps, “Hey man, let’s have one more smokes ..” be the better answer. It ccertainly will not depend on “God bless America” or “America will save the world” sort of mental nonsense regardless of who gets voted or who said what. It depends entirely on the individual’s desire for evolution or devolution whether he realises it or not.