Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Amazon to try crummy e-book format again

Weed them and reap
Friday, 16 November 2007, 12:24

YOU COULD CALL it a conundrum but one of the greatest successes of the internet age has been Amazon.com, a company that sells books – dye printed onto dead trees – that are then sent via the postal service in a franked package and delivered manually to your door.

And one of the great failures of the Internet age has been attempts to revolutionise the format by digitising the content and making it available at low cost in real time. Now, Amazon is trying to change that situation by launching its own e-book. But will it succeed?

The short answer is, 'nah, probably not,' but Amazon obviously feels differently as, according to CNet, it will launch its Kindle device on Monday in the magnificent city of New York, home of the many of the world’s greatest bars, notably The Old Town and Peter MacManus.

This effort has Wi-Fi, direct links to the Amazon site but it also packs one horrible feature – the price. If CNet is right, this thing will cost $399, a price that is crazy as a loon. Because e-books are such a bad idea that the only way these things will fly, or even have a prayer of flying, is if they’re giveaway cheap. Maybe a tenth of that price.

You can see why Amazon might be keen. If it can grab the digital book market the way it has grabbed the physical book market and flip the way people consume reading matter then it can rid itself of scads of costly infrastructure. No warehouses, not many pesky employees, almost zero supply chain.

But here are the problems:

Item: Paper is great. It’s very, very cheap and there’s plenty of spare capacity – witness the success of Lulu.com. It’s flexible, disposable and recyclable. If you lose your book you don’t report it to the police. Idiot friends might not return your precious volumes but it’s not like you’ve lent them your laptop.

Item: Your eyes aren’t cut out for staring into a light. It’s not a nice experience. Reading a book is an aesthetic, tactile pleasure and there is a micro-boom in expensive, gorgeous limited editions.

Item: Electronic equipment is fundamentally unreliable. Batteries run out, screens crack, storage media fail, and sometimes the damn thing just won’t turn on. Books lose a bit of gum and get mottled so the pages run out, but it doesn’t really matter as you can still read them. I have books that date back to before World War II. I own no other equipment that dates as far back apart from a house, and 99.999 per cent of that belongs to my mortgage lender.

Bottom line: E-books are handy for blokes up telegraph poles consulting compex manuals. They are very poor indeed for blokes sat at home with a calming drink, working their way through Our Mutual Friend.

The End. µ

Share this:

Comments
Uhm..

People have mobile phones. Same principle on that, so sorry I don't agree with the first reasoning. Also, paper is heavy, especially on longer trips or when you need reference manuals.

As for the second, quite, this is why any truly serious e-reader these days will be e-ink.

posted by : Andrew Crystall, 16 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Well...

I have the original Sony Reader which I bought before a trip that involved a big amount of hours in planes, trains and lines, and despite it's flaws I am very happy with it. Even after the trip I've been using it with no problems. Now, it doesn't replace the feeling of pages in your hand but, does it really matter? For some it does but for me it's a matter of getting use to it. 

Now, the pictures from the Amazon device make it look seriously clunky. Do you really want to browse on ePaper?

posted by : Nick R, 16 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Epaper!

According to the engadget writeups, Kindle is an epaper reader, which is why it costs $400. In other words, no staring into a light with this.

posted by : Jordan, 16 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Bad post

It seems the writer doesn't really see the full potential of e-paper. It could be that 399$ is too expensive (it is) but prices will go down and you will be able to buy a sub 200$ device by the end of 2008 if not before that.

It also seems that the writer knows very little on e-paper in general - Like the fact that they do not emit any light (unlike LCD for example) - see here for more:
http://www.tfot.info/articles/1000/the-future-of-electronic-paper.html

posted by : Iddo Genuth, 18 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Bull

"Your eyes aren’t cut out for staring into a light."--what nonsense. What else are your eyes seeing, if not light? Whether it's emitted light, reflected light, transmitted light, refracted light, light vinaigrettes with light Benedict with a helping of light Julienne on the side makes no difference. As far as your eyes are concerned, light is light.

posted by : Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 19 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Does it scale?

As Doctorow teaches, the only thing that matters in a case like this, does it scale vastly better than the old medium? I do not have the definite answer... it's surely not as big change as the printing press was over manual written codexes. However the traveling crowd may love it and that's not so small crowd.

posted by : Charlie, 19 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Its the marketing, not the technology

Sony's got a new version of their reader out, its priced at $300. That buys a lot of paperback books (which is what one large publisher announced recently is all they're going to make in the future).

All this technology is usable but unfortunately its just not cost effective yet. The reader has to be priced at a point where it can be lost before this technology will be usable to the masses. (It could also do with some extras like audio/video......)

posted by : Martin, 19 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?