LOOKS AS IF INTEL has had its arm twisted. Anand Chandrasekher, Chipzilla’s GM of ultra-mobility products, has had to more or less apologise for members of his workforce who used Intel’s Taiwanese IDF to slag off processors designed by British mobile chip firm ARM.
The Intel website reckons Chandrasekher has “issued a correction” in which he acknowledges Intel’s Atom doesn’t quite match the ARM processor’s battery life in a phone form factor.
Also, Chandrasekher was forced to admit that, while Chipzilla does plan to forage further into the low, low, low-power domain, well, the firm wasn’t quite there yet. They’re still at arms length.
The groveling didn’t stop at ARM either. Chandrasekher had to humbly eat Apple pie, noting that the Iphone, despite what his staff thinks, “is an extremely innovative product that enables new and exciting market opportunities”.
The hand which stirred the pot in Taiwan belonged to Intel's director of ultra-mobile ecosystems, Pankaj Kedia , who kicked off a mud-slinging war with his comments, "the shortcomings of the Iphone are not because of Apple. The shortcomings of the Iphone have come from ARM".
Chandrasekher has now said these statements were inappropriate, and that Intel reps "should not have been commenting on specific customer designs”.
Surely they meant no ‘arm. µ
See
Also
Intel keeps laying into ARM
I wonder what communication has happened between Apple and Intel to spark this.
"the shortcomings of the Iphone ARE because of Apple."
They probably threatened to switch to AMD in their desktops and laptops!
I disable Flash and Java in my browser, thank you very much.

The iPhone's web experience is the best in mobile devices, bar none, and the reason why people put up with the iPhone's shortcomings like the lack of Bluetooth keyboard support or of tethering, none of which have anything to do with ARM. Whatever Kedia is smoking is not going to help Intel catch up with ARM in the low-power space.
Hahahahahahaha! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! HAHOOHOOHEEHEEHAHAHA! AH-HAAAAA-HA-HAHAHA! HAHAHAH-HAH-HAHAHA!

Oh dearie me... (wipes tears from eyes)
Their comments (and others in the past, particularly that only x86 is able to provide a full web experience) were/are verging on libellous - the comments are demonstrably incorrect and potentially harmful to ARMs business.

A simple letter from the ARM legal department would be enough to get Intel to shut the f*** up.