Chips

Intel Nehalem details outed

Apparently

By INQUIRER staff

Fri Nov 30 2007, 10:48

X86 WATCH said that a heap of information about Intel Nehalem product plans have been outed on Japanese site PC Watch.

Those include dual core Havendale, Auburndale chips, eight core Nehalem EX (Beckton), which has 24MB shared cash, "extreme performance" Bloomfield, and Nehalem EP Gainestown, which apparently is quad core 8MB shared cache chip.

Will they all come to pass. Well they will, no doubt. But they won't have such exotic codenames by the team they do. Some more here. µ

Tags: Intel

Intel delays product after product without competition Sandy and Ivy Bridges delayed by weak Bulldozer performance Friday, 16 December 2011, 16:00 PM Read more	AMD launches its 8-core and 16-core Opteron Bulldozer chips Better late than never Monday, 14 November 2011, 05:00 AM Read more
Intel X79 chipset and Socket 2011 are ready for the desktop 64GB of RAM in a standard PC Tuesday, 20 September 2011, 15:06 PM Read more	Intel Westmere EX Xeons extend x86 power More than just a process shrink Friday, 29 April 2011, 09:00 AM Read more
HP rounds up customers to have a go at Oracle Takes another pot shot at Ellison Thursday, 14 April 2011, 17:46 PM Read more	Intel launches mission critical Xeon E3 and E7 chips Takes another stab at enterprise servers Tuesday, 5 April 2011, 17:00 PM Read more

< Previous article| Next article >

Comments

To words

That sony party must of been better than they let on.

They must be getting alot of "cash" now for being a "team" player LMAO [You're banned from commenting James. Ed.]




posted by : James, 01 December 2007 Complain about this comment

cache

24MB shared L2? I thought it was 16MB (2x8MB) shared for the dual die, eight-core part.

posted by : jeffery, 30 November 2007 Complain about this comment

Wowee

Cash? Team?

posted by : Words, 30 November 2007 Complain about this comment

INQ White papers

Databases

Network management

Security

Service oriented architecture

Storage

INQ Jobs

solution architect

Solution Architect / Techni...

INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?

Yes, companies should suffer an immediate death penalty upon being accused of copyright infringement.

Yes, the coppers said the company was breaking the law so it must be guilty.

No, the company and the people accused are innocent until proven guilty.

No, the company had millions of customers who have been harmed by having access to their data files cut off.

I don't care, I never used Megaupload anyway.

View other polls

© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093

SEARCH :

Site Credentials:

Business & Technology websites:

Business research resources:

Products:

Investment Market IT websites:

Find out what you are worth:

Salary Calculator

Search for a job:

Recruitment Agency A-Z Directory

Accreditations:

Digital Publisher of the Year 2010

Intel Nehalem details outed

Share this:

RIM Playbook OS 2.0 and Blackberry 7.1 video demo

Nokia Lumia 710 video review