Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Japan branding futures - the Sony story

Letters from Tokyo Brands and innovation fading away?
Friday, 24 October 2008, 17:40

IT WAS interesting to compare Tokyo and Taipei within the space of just a week. The two cities are just three hours away by plane, but couldn't be more different - most of Taipei, excluding Xinyi where Taipei One-on-One and TWTC are, looks like those 70s Godzilla Japantown movie sets where dirty Lego-like cubes with unwashed facades represent buildings.

Tokyo is way bigger, way cleaner too, and somehow more futuristic, including those impossible rainbows of colours flashing on the neon signs of major brands there.

Brands? That's an interesting comparison too - while Taipei's PC component giants have only recently started their global branding expansion, Japan was there for decades. Sony, Toshiba, Panasonic, NEC, Fujitsu - and do you still remember TDK cassettes or Akai and Aiwa Hi-Fi sets?

But, the brand strength doesn't seem to blossom that much anymore in the land of cherry blossoms. Even places like Akihabara have an increasing non-Japan vendor presence in every product segment, for the first time matching the Japanese ones in some cases.

Sony, the uberbrand of Japan, is a good example. Things like transistor radios followed by top notch HiFi lines, Trinitron TV sets and Walkmans were the lifestyle landmarks of the generations from 60s to early 90s. We all know what happened to it in the past few years, with LCD and Plasma TVs from other vendors pushing Sony aside in the television market, MP3 players obsoleting the Walkman, and all the recent Playstation delays.

It seemed as if there was no die-hard competitive push in there anymore. What happened? At a price of a cheap Western dinner (I still don't know what attracts the Japanese to TGI Fridays next to much nicer local outlets), a talkative Sony exec shared some thoughts with me near their Tokyo office.

The exec's observation for a main reason was that, like several other large Japanese companies, Sony lost the 'fighting spirit': two decades ago, the employees, engineers included, loved their brand, eat and breathed their brand, and competed irrespective of personal sacrifices to stay on top of the heap in technology, performance, design and sales - globally.

In the past fiften or so years, the exec says, the new breed of youngsters came in with a different focus: make the quickest possible buck riding on the company's brand for an improved CV, and then job-hop to the next target, repeating the play.

As a result, no one really focuses on the best products, specs or even meeting the timelines, especially since the Japanese equality-oriented system has little reward for the overachievers. The exec even mentioned several known cases where the products were rushed out without completely implementing or validating some critical features at start.

Then, things that would have been considered an outright insult to the company 20 years ago - like key components sourced from China and Korea - are now commonplace. And, according to the exec, no one inside seems to care much.

The result? Samsung beat Sony in TV and video branding, and Lenovo did the same for notebooks. As for portable media, even Creative Zen has seemingly better recognition than Sony's successors to the one and only Walkman.

On the other hand, not many in the Tokyo office were happy in the past when Sony started spending top bucks on the Hollywood movie buzz followed by all the DRMed music mess. The feeling among some of the old guard, the source says, was that the core focus of Sony - the best consumer electronics there is - was lost. Well, I guess, that feeling was right at least.

Another observation by the exec was that Japan made a cardinal mistake by not pursuing its own CPU architecture and instruction set, even if it meant taking over a "gaijin" (Western foreigner) one like MIPS (NEC) or Alpha (Mitsubishi) and developing it independently across all market segments.

Only Fujitsu enjoys continued success with its own SPARC64 line there, but it is limited to the large server market niche. The exec's point was that Playstations and Nintendos should use Japan-made, Japan-designed CPUs with all product control there, rather than let an external party potentially hold them hostage. There was a group within Sony which lobbied for this approach since the start of the Playstation effort, according to our source.

Talking about Playstation, the exec thinks it was overall a global winner opportunity missed, partly due to the misunderstanding by certain parts of management what this market really is and how to address it, as well as underestimating the Microsoft danger. The feel of "it was our market to lose" was there.

The person I talked to is not confident of the next-gen Playstation being delivered on time either, even though this time the 'senior management' is supposedly more pushy - the feel is that new truly driven project leader team is needed. The problem? Too many managerial staff seem to be contented with the present situation where their sales mostly ride on the past glory of Sony.

Finally, while the innovation seems to be more patchy these days among some of the brands here, the exec made a point that there are thousands of technology breakthroughs - many related to consumer electronics too - in Japan's superb R &D centres and academia, and quite a few very applicable right from the start. But, still, very few ever get considered for a business spin or even properly considered by the big fish.

It's still not too late for the likes of Sony - or, for that matter, other Japanese biggies - to come back and force a reconquista of the global consumer electronics and computer markets, or at least a bit extra market share gain. A combination of new "killer product", consistent technology and design lead, and a bit of refreshed, more aggressive marketing and PR on the worldwide level, could be just the right cure.

As for the exec, the source is right now looking for a hop to another job next year - purely for the monetary gain, supposedly... that's Japan, too. µ

Share this:

Comments
problem is aging corporate culture

As a company ages, it loses it's edge. At the beginning, you've got nothing to lose so you aim for the top. Eventually, staff start caring about losing their position rather than reaching for new glory. There's no rewards for success but punishment for failure so no one takes any chances by innovating anymore. It's not just the Japanese companies that have these problems, it's every company everywhere. Just give those successful taipei companies 20 years and they'll be in the same spot.

posted by : jason, 24 October 2008 Complain about this comment
This sounds familiar

Gee, sounds so much like an American story. Glad the see the Japs have finally fallen to our level of competitiveness. And someone hungrier is eating THEIR lunch, haha!

posted by : Rich Wargo, 24 October 2008 Complain about this comment
it's the world

It isn't just Japan, it's the world. Think of any great brand, whatever it represented - Sears, 
Chevrolet 65--70, just name it. They are gone.
Every product now gets out of it's warranty, enough to prevent arguments, and just crumbles.
Those money-sniffing young execs represent almost every colleague I have had. And why not? What are they going to do for you if you are 'loyal'? If they have to lay off, they do.
And, i must say, the old sensei has a slightly romantic view of old Japan. Yes, people were dedicated - but only vertically, to the boss. The department next door could go to hell.
And you already mentioned the lack of individual initiative.
One of the cleverest ways of dealing with modern realities was implemented by Fender, the guitar maker. They have cheap guitars, made in Mexico. And they don't hide it. Actually, for $175 or so, they are pretty good. And then they have guitars 100% made (and hand finished) in the USA. They are seriously good - and 15 times the price.
The only other alternative seems to be the Harley route. They finally realized they were an icon. They make them just like the 50s - heavy castings, steel, thick chrome. And they cost as much as they have to (the price of a good car!) And yet no one could start an unknown company, particularly in tech, and act like these examples.

posted by : chrstphr, 25 October 2008 Complain about this comment
Price

As I see it, one of Sony's major problems up until the last few years was their continuing assumption that people would unquestioningly pay over the odds for the Sony brand despite the absence of any feature or quality differentiation from their competitors, or similarly pay the same for an inferior product.

They appear to be turning this attitude around lately, but changes in consumer confidence aren't instant; the reason they were able to carry on like this for as long as they did is the same reason it's taking them a while to rectify the situation.

posted by : Lindsay, 25 October 2008 Complain about this comment
Disgruntled employee

Sounds to me like you met a disgruntled mid-40s manager about to jump ship. The mere fact that this guy met with a foreigner to let off steam says more about the current state of Japanese management than anything he said. In any case he can be sure none of his superiors will see this article unless someone translates it to Japanese (unlikely).

There is too much whining and "Japanese salarymen are not what they used to be". As someone working in a Japanese company, I see the opposite: The old guard, with their insistence on "serving the company without regard for the self" tire young, enthusiastic employees with needless overtime, bureaucracy to keep the middle management busy, stifling initiative and risk-taking because nothing can be done without consensus. No wonder the young, talented ones brush up their CVs and run. It's not them being illoyal, it's Sony being unable to keep them.

As for what happened to Sony, it simply spread to far and lost sight of what it is: a consumer electronics company. They should get rid of the music labels and movie studios and concentrate on living room hardware again.

At the end of the 90ies, everybody thought it's control of content that will make the next winner. With youtube and friends, that turned out to be wrong. Instead, Apple was right: You need great software with your hardware, and you need to control the channel, not the content.

posted by : mkill, 27 October 2008 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?