Intel Woodcrest whops Opteron, report

SPEC results compared

By INQUIRER staff

Sat Jun 03 2006, 11:45

A FILING on the BEA Developer forum appears to show that Intel's forthcoming Woodcrest chips have the edge over the AMD opposition.

The data, here, compares a result using Woodcrest on a Dell box, which the developer claims shows a 50 per cent boost over previous comparable X86 results, and also shows respectable results for big Unix servers from IBM, from Fujitsu, and from Sun.

The tests use Jrockit, which the author claims is already optimised for Woodcrest. µ

AMD launches its 8-core and 16-core Opteron Bulldozer chips Better late than never Monday, 14 November 2011, 05:00 AM Read more	Vector Fabrics releases a tool to aid multi-threaded developers Offers a hand to coders wanting to push X86 to the limit Wednesday, 20 July 2011, 15:30 PM Read more
AMD is in trouble, says analyst But we beg to differ Wednesday, 13 July 2011, 15:17 PM Read more	Intel announces 22nm 50-core Knights Corner chip Believes easy programming holds the key Monday, 20 June 2011, 13:00 PM Read more
Intel Westmere EX Xeons extend x86 power More than just a process shrink Friday, 29 April 2011, 09:00 AM Read more	Intel pushes Xeon into Itanium territory Claims firms can take the RISC with commodity CISC hardware Tuesday, 5 April 2011, 18:00 PM Read more

< Previous article| Next article >

Comments

There are no comments submitted yet. Do you have an interesting opinion? Then be the first to post a comment.

INQ White papers

Databases

Network management

Security

Service oriented architecture

Storage

INQ Jobs

IT Security Specialist Mov

IT Security Specialist Move...

INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?

Yes, companies should suffer an immediate death penalty upon being accused of copyright infringement.

Yes, the coppers said the company was breaking the law so it must be guilty.

No, the company and the people accused are innocent until proven guilty.

No, the company had millions of customers who have been harmed by having access to their data files cut off.

I don't care, I never used Megaupload anyway.

View other polls

© Incisive Media Investments Limited 2012, Published by Incisive Financial Publishing Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, are companies registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 04252091 & 04252093

SEARCH :

Site Credentials:

Business & Technology websites:

Business research resources:

Products:

Investment Market IT websites:

Find out what you are worth:

Salary Calculator

Search for a job:

Recruitment Agency A-Z Directory

Accreditations:

Digital Publisher of the Year 2010

Intel Woodcrest whops Opteron, report

Share this:

RIM Playbook OS 2.0 and Blackberry 7.1 video demo

Nokia Lumia 710 video review