Jump to content
The Inquirer-Home

Google caves on privacy

Cuts anonymisation deadline by half
Tuesday, 9 September 2008, 12:32

GOOGLE SAID yesterday it would cut its data anonymisaton deadline in half, from 18 to nine months, but the firm is whining that, by doing so, it will be leaving people at greater risk from fraud.

Feeling the mounting pressure from the US department of Justice, the EU and privacy campaigners, Google, the giant of Internet search, has apparently been forced by the Lilliputians to cave in, according to a blog post on the company site.

But despite “significantly shortening our previous 18-month retention policy to address regulatory concerns and to take another step to improve privacy for our users", Google’s global privacy counsel, Peter Fleischer, senior privacy counsel Jane Horvath and software engineer Alma Whitten solemnly warned the move could do more harm than good and "would degrade the utility of the data too much and outweigh the incremental privacy benefit for users".

The three reckoned the whole reason behind clutching onto data for a year and-a-half in the first place was not to ‘invade’ people’s privacy and spy on them, but to have enough time to go through data and pick out fraudsters and scammers. So, as Google sees it, the less time it has to pick through your private information, the less privacy benefits you actually get. And if you believe that, you’ll also believe pigs fly.

Google is feeling sorry for itself and is obviously feeling the urge for a little moan about how nobody likes you once you reach the top. Boo-hoo, pass the tissues. But luckily, it seems the firm is also learning from the Vole’s mistakes and taking antitrust accusations from the DOJ – about its search advertising deal with Yahoo – very seriously.

So as long as the firm resolves to stick to its mantra, some good may prevail after all. µ

Share this:

Comments
BS.

They want it for it's marketing value, pure and simple. They need to have enough time to mine it and extract all the possible marketable value from it before they delete it. This doesn't have the slightest to do with protecting people's privacy...it has to do with exploiting the fact that your users have no privacy.

posted by : Motoman, 09 September 2008 Complain about this comment
anatomisation

would be even more annoying if spelled: agnatomisation_
but for lack of a spellified Donner 
owning up to anonymousation,
anonymisaton will have to do...
Not a cursor was swearing
Not even a mouse
I anathematise on me 
demographer's grave!-)

posted by : Rudolf Blitzen, 09 September 2008 Complain about this comment
utube

so on one hand the dept of us justice tell google to stop recording peoples personal details, on the other it tells google (youtube)to hand everyones personal details to viacom?

posted by : thechevron, 10 September 2008 Complain about this comment
Advertisement
Subscribe to the INQ Newsletter
Sign-up for the INQBot weekly newsletter
Click here to sign up Existing user
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Christmas computer sales

Will you be buying a new computer this Christmas?