THE CHOICE OF BING as the Internet search vendor in Apple's Iphone OS 4 might at first glance seem like vindication for Microsoft, but in reality it's little more than a token gesture.
Microsoft deserves a nod for the way it dragged its search business from years of irrelevance into becoming the most talked about search engine of the past year. To Microsoft's credit, Bing hasn't fallen flat on its face, even managing to post very modest increases in market share due to it's deal with Yahoo.
As Google's relationship with Apple has turned sour, the idea of Bing displacing Google as the default search provider on the Iphone gained momentum. Apple's silence on the matter was punctuated by Apple CEO Steve Jobs' rant against Google and his firm's lawsuit against the manufacturer of Google's showpiece smartphones for it's Android OS, HTC. The lofty goal of replacing Google has itself been replaced with Jobs merely putting Bing on the substitute bench.
The lukewarm response from Jobs is more likely to leave Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer throwing chairs than throwing a party. After all, Yahoo has been the alternate search vendor since the first Iphone came out and that hasn't exactly lit a fire beneath the floundering search portal and its fight against obscurity.
As Ballmer bangs his head against the wall, he should be relieved that Jobs didn't give Bing a wide berth. Instead Apple's dear leader even proclaimed that Microsoft has "done a great job" and that it was "cool", quite a compliment from the head of the firm that is seen by many as the epitome of cool. As for Microsoft, Jobs' apparent benevolence might be the last opportunity the Vole has to gain a foothold in mobile search.
Microsoft shouldn't expect much help from Google, as its army of Android smartphone users grows with every passing week. The search giant doesn't allow alternatives to its own product on Android and while Microsoft could, like it did on the Iphone, create a Bing application, given the tight integration Android has with Google's search, it's highly unlikely that the majority of Android users would bother to use it.
So why did Jobs give Bing such a glowing endorsement? Was he just throwing a bone out to its rival that effectively saved it from going under all those years ago? Or was Jobs just trying to let Google know that despite Android making significant gains in the market, he can still play kingmaker. Actually it's a bit of both, we think.
While Apple fans like to paint Microsoft as the biggest threat to the firm after Mac clones, Jobs has long since realised that Apple needs Microsoft, only now the roles are reversed. Aside from direct financial backing, for a long time Apple has relied on the continuing availability of Microsoft's Office suite to push Macintoshes into corporate environments.
In the last decade Microsoft's power in this area has rapidly diminished, with free alternatives such as Openoffice and Google Docs now offering similar features. However, Microsoft's influence over the Mac extends deeper than just its bloated productivity suite.
When the Vole decided to call a halt to Internet Explorer for the Mac, Apple was eventually forced to develop an alternative, which thankfully is far more standards compliant than anything Microsoft has ever produced. Remember the gusto with which Jobs introduced Boot Camp, the bootloader that allows users to easily boot between Mac OS X and Windows? The fact that Apple had to go out of its comfort zone on more than one occasion to compensate for and accommodate Microsoft's products is testament both to how much power Microsoft had gained in Apple's market and Jobs' need to reclaim his control.
By letting Bing come and play in his Iphone world, Jobs must have felt some sort of vindication that after years of accommodating Microsoft's whims, he was able to act as gatekeeper to something that he knows means a lot to Microsoft. Like any stage performer, Jobs knows that he must "keep 'em wanting more", and so he did, by not offering the whole shooting match.
Will Apple's selection of Bing make any real difference to its search fortunes? No. Not unless Microsoft manages to pony up enough cash and tune its products to Jobs' needs. Otherwise it is likely that Apple might return to Google as its default Internet search offering, perhaps using that as a bargaining threat.
For Microsoft, search isn't the only aspect of the Iphone it can target as Apple and Google drift further apart. The Iphone's built-in maps application uses data from Google with Yahoo providing data for the weather and financial applications, all of which are potential battlegrounds for Bing.
Microsoft does of course have Windows Phone 7 coming up and, like Android and Google, we expect Microsoft to integrate Bing into the operating system extremely tightly. However given that Windows Phone 7 looks to have all the hallmarks of Windows ME, Microsoft's best hope for mobile search is that Apple users pick its search service over its rival's.
Search engines need mobile devices not just for search but to help gain access to data that can be used to bolster value added features such as geo-location based advertising services and augmented reality. These data mashups are becoming increasingly important as devices allow for what search vendors like to term 'rich experiences'. Though that might sound like mere marketing guff, providing all these rich experiences in real time is a non-trivial technology problem.
To that end Bing has announced that it will be 'trending' the social networking websites Facebook and Twitter, even providing reasons why particular topics are popular. Real time Twitter search is nothing new, as both Google and Bing have been doing it for some time, but their inclusion of social context shows where search is heading. Results no longer have to be relevant to just the subject matter, but also to social context, location and time.
Mobile search not only gives search vendors and their marketing departments access to 'eyeballs' but also to data that includes fine grained location information, which is the type of data that is a goldmine for advertisers. And it's those spinners that are the real customers that both Microsoft and Google want to woo.
Jobs' pleasantries cost Apple nothing, however given the attention it has generated, it's shown how much power Apple and the Iphone still wield in the mobile domain. Sadly for Microsoft, even with Jobs' blessing, Bing like many of Microsoft's products has to be forced onto users to gain more market share. µ
The constant sarcastic nastiness that the Inquirer spouts, whilst amusing initially, does eventually wear...
Please pray tell, what is the purpose of this?
Google is better known as the company that fails at everything except search. that the only way to get people to use them is to force them down people's throats or in this case spam. Look at buzz. a total failure which suddenly showed up on gmail (like spam) (the only successful google product other than search). wave is a failure. google docs is also a failure even after heavy promoting on their site even more so now that MS entered with better fidelity office web apps. It failed to displace office, it is severly underpowered and it makes no money. youtube is a money drain.
google is frantically scrambling to find other revenue streams and it finds none. It needs to grow its market share in order to grow but it can't advance further due to bing. google literaly has no plans for growth other than throwing badly cooked projects at the wall and seeing what sticks.
so it is incorrect to think google has little to worry about about bing or apple. It wouldn't take much to knock them off their only revenue model: ads. All it takes is for microsoft and apple to ship adblock plus like technlogy to kill google's only cash cow. Or for MS or apple to lock out google from mobile ads. Or just like google replaced yahoo, another start up could come and out do them.
Google's future remains in doubt with an OS that makes no money from sales and even if it outstrips the iphone of its market share, anti-trust regulators will not let them bundle google products with it for long just like it happened to MSFT.
So the start of the post-google world is not far away and that's ok because they were better as just a search engine company that people liked instead of this microsoft 2.0 googleliath of company that wants to spam you with ads every chance it gets. good riddance I say.
... may I say how pleasant it is to read a commentary on the Inquirer that is insightful, critical, even biting that doesn't undermine it's own credibility with nasty, ad hominem flame-bait insults directed at the companies its discussing and the customers of those companies
Last I heard, Android was behind even Microsoft for mobile OS market share. It may be growing faster, but its got a long way to go.
And as for Microsoft and Apple shuffling desk chairs, its an apt analogy for Microsoft, maybe, but Apple's wave hasn't even begun to crest. As long as their "closed" systems continue to reek of excellence, then their business model will continue to prosper even against the choice of more open models.
Bill wrote:
2) Google's Android is (now has more market share than Apple's iPhone).
Get a CLUE Bill. Why do people feel the need to comment, when they obviously know nothing about the topic?
Why must people read way too much into this stuff? This article is 100% anal overboard over-cooked over and over and over.
Oh, and yes, the search engine in selectable on iOS 4.
1) Microsoft's "Windows phone 7" is no threat in the mobile space.
2) Google's Android is (now has more market share than Apple's iPhone).
3) Google and Microsoft both have search engines, while Apple does not.
4) Surprise: Microsoft Bing is let into the walled garden.
However, I think that it is nice to see both Microsoft and Apple aboard the sinking ship of proprietary closed-source software. This makes it a very clear choice for consumers: either they support autocracy and allow themselves to be controlled and manipulated by control-happy companies and proprietary software, or they opt for openness and the ability to control their own use of their purchased devices.
I hope Apple and Microsoft have fun frantically shuffling the deck chairs as they go under.
...please learn the difference between "it's" and "its".
Phone me when you're done.
Can users select a different search engine for the phone to use? I hope so. Otherwise that would be annoying, and probably make the Europeans refer it for legal assessment.
This is how you spell iPhone.