The Inquirer-Home

OLED displays will come along

Analysis Go with the glow
Wed Feb 17 2010, 17:42

HALFWAY THROUGH the noughties manufacturers of display panels were wowing punters at CES with prototypes using Organic Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) technology. Initially developed by Kodak, the OLED screens produced sumptuous visuals with energy efficient 1000,000:1 contrast ratios that could be viewed even in direct sunlight. Really, how many technologies had the word 'organic' in their names? You could probably offset your carbon footprint just by powering one up.

We were told that OLED technology would be a five-year roadmap away from mass adoption. Display makers were aquiver with anticipation at how they would deploy OLEDs over a wide range of display products. A chorus of angels could be heard singing in the background. The future was very bright indeed.

While Sony wasn't one of the first hardware manufacturers to wave the flag for OLED it did take over as the standard bearer for innovations in the OLED market. Just two years after the first prototypes appeared at CES, Sony demoed its own in 2007 with the worlds first 27-inch OLED TV. It delivered a full HD 1080p screen and Sony's former president, Ryoji Chubachi told a briefing of tech buyers, "I want this world's first OLED TV to be the symbol of the revival of Sony's technological prowess. I want this to be the flag under which we charge forwards to turn the fortunes around."

At the time of the debut Sony claimed it didn't have any plans for full scale production but that prototype bore fruit in the guise of a huge announcement at next year's CES in 2008. In 2008 Sony unveiled the XEL-1, the word's first commercial OLED TV. Randy Waynick, senior vice president of Sony Electronics' home products division said, "Not only does the technology change the form factor of television, it delivers flawless picture quality that will soon become the standard against which all TVs are measured. The launch of an OLED TV is one of the most important industry landmarks"

The £3,000 asking price for the XEL-1 was a lot of cash, about the same cost of 50 to 60 inches of display real estate on a prosumer plasma screen about five years ago. We also know that Sony has a commendable history of supporting next generation technology but the screen size of the XEL-1 came in at... 11-inches. It seemed that the economies of scales for OLED displays weren't serviceable and mass adoption would have to wait.

Then Reuters reported this week that Sony was going to stop manufacturing OLED TVs in Japan and if you can't sell next generation technology in Japan where can you sell it? Sony said it would stop production when the last of its current models leave the factory floor and claimed, "We will continue to consider new products and applications including OLED TVs."

So is it sayonara OLED? Not even close. While Sony's attempts to sell high-end TV's have been halted, it has deployed OLED displays in a range of its other products, including its NWZ-X1050B and NWZ-X1060B Walkmans and some Cybershot digital cameras. Microsoft is offering OLED screens in its Zune HD music player and Nikon launched a Coolpix S70 camera, which has a 3.5-inch OLED touchscreen. LG bought Kodak's OLED business in 2009 while Samsung unveiled the world's biggest OLED at this year's CES, along with an OLED photocard.

Sony has only said told the public that it stopped production in Japan but we reckon it's a suspension of activity until the economies of scale shift enough to make mass adoption economically viable. There's self-emitting light at the end of the tunnel. µ

Share this:

Comments
it's there already

Samsung deployed in our local MediaMarkt several OLED TV's and displays, they look awesome, but their contrast is said to be only 1000:1 (the sales manager told it's the real world contrast, don't know what it means though, the samsung website claims 3000000:1). I also see them on your website though at a price twice the local store (I live in Hungary)

posted by : Andrew, 22 February 2010 Complain about this comment
RE:chump

LCD does have another couple of major advantages over CRT, one being LCD images are sharp, whereas CRT's are quite blurry comparatively, and another being LCD's don't shower you in radiation when you use them.

I already spend far too much time on the computer, I don't need cancer too.

posted by : Ben, 22 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Small OLEDs on TV's == Dumb

Smart take on Sony's OLED blunder here: http://www.gadgetopolis.com/posts/7417

If only they started out in a market where a small screen would be more acceptable.

posted by : Coolio, 19 February 2010 Complain about this comment
pants

SED is meant to be after OLED, so thats why this crap happens since they like to milk in sequence rather than do the best they can.

like chumps with LCD thinking it was an upgrade from CRT, still waiting for a proper improvement not just thinner.

posted by : chump, 18 February 2010 Complain about this comment
@Disco

Care to explain what negatives SED has compared to OLED besides uber thinness?

SED is not dead. Canon is still developing it as they're no longer being harassed by Applied Nanotech, Inc.

SED, from a simplification standpoint, uses a CRT gun for each individual pixel in the display. It truly can boast a high, NATIVE contrast ratio without any of this bullshit dynamic market speak.

Yes, it is expensive as it hasn't been commoditized yet. However, OLED is nearly in the same boat. It's only been used for small PMP and cell phones. At least Canon demonstrated a 50" prototype whereas you haven't seen anything of that size from the OLED camp (the modular OLED display notwithstanding).

I hear Canon is still developing this technology for video reference monitors in post houses, etc.

posted by : Charles, 18 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Punctuation; you've hear of it, right?

Is punctuation going out of style, or is the editor afraid of commas these days?

posted by : fattty, 18 February 2010 Complain about this comment
@ Scott

1,000,000:1 = 1 million to 1

True, there is a small typo there as "1,000,000" is written as "1000,000", but I don't see the problem in understanding this. Sure, if the Inq were a mainland European site then I could understand the comma causing confusion (especially for Germans), but otherwise there's no way that number could ever have meant 1000/1,000.

I hasten to add I mean no flame or troll by this. It was simply to clear up the matter.

posted by : S Ansell, 17 February 2010 Complain about this comment
11 inches of dumb

And from the link to the XEL-1:
960 x 540
It has to fake its way through all resolutions. What a big bail o' fail.

posted by : Owain, 17 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Scale

$3000 for an 11" tv? so basically they were having trouble making them of any reasonable size at the time.

posted by : bob, 17 February 2010 Complain about this comment
1000,000:1 contrast ratio?

A thousand to one contrast ratio is horrible! Or was he using the backward Yank method and trying to say its a million to one?

posted by : Scott, 17 February 2010 Complain about this comment
SED died

LOL, where have you been. SED died a long time ago.
It was very limited in size and more expensive to make. It also had many other negatives when compared to OLEDs.

posted by : Disco, 17 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Also

I want SED. Any news on that? Anyone?

posted by : b, 17 February 2010 Complain about this comment
aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?