It's hilarious that the original article has tiny pictures with links to the originals with a warning that they are sizes like 22KB or 70KB, and they are talking about hugely improving fiber speed, while thinking people can't handle a 22KB picture, even my old dialupmodem would not have an issue, it's surreal.
and then when you follow the link the pictures are still too tiny to make out clearly really, I guess they do actually use dialup there then?
Oh and the pictures are graphs and such but they use jpeg, I can't believe a publication like nature(.com) is so uninformed about the internet and about graphics.