Since probably the phone companies will ban voice-over-IP communication...
Here's what we do: when you want to make a phone call, our software speech-recognises what you say, and texts it tu the intended recipient. At that end, text-to-speech recreates an audible version using the sound of your voice.
Or for the premium price, the sound of a celebrity's voice. Ladies! Have the man in your life sound like George Clooney. Men! Have your special lady sound like Jessica Rabbit.
Or pay -discount- price and you get Elmer Fudd and Bugs Bunny. What ever turns you on.
From the first day a modem was created that could send arbitrary data over a telecom line, that was the beginning of the end. This is just the natural progression. Expect a huge fight.
4G was finishing testing when they were still trying to negotiate deals to buy the first 3G equipment. 4G could have easily shipped when 3G did. It would have been a wise move for the phone companies, who are perfectly capable of pricing services based on demand and perceived value instead of actual cost (see texting prices for proof). However the few network providers had too many ties to equipment manufacturers, who would have lost a lot of money on 3G if no one bought it.
Welcome to corporatist America, where you're free as long as you can always get government permission. I'm sure they'll find ways to track phone minutes separately from data and rip you off, I mean bill you accordingly.
Voice Quality of current 3G mobiles/networks is pathetic compared to landlines and voice dropouts frequent on any uk mobile network. Perhaps operators can allocate more bandwidth and QOS to voice traffic on 4G.
Also it is waste of limited natural resource(bandwitdh) to remain on 2G and 3G.Earlier we move to 4G, more effiently we can use the spectrum. Seeing how long it has taken to move to 3G in UK, it does not seem the move to 4G will happen anytime soon.
They said the same for 3G.Unless they give it user functional QoS and reduce their already stinking latency then 4G will be just as uselesss for voice as 3G, which already has more than enough bandwidth to carry voice.
So 4G - you have an iphone / android - are already PAYING for FREE/INCLUDED MINUTES every month. (that now you won't use) < aha they figured that in didn't they.
So you have a choice of using your free minutes or chewing into your very very very unLIMITED cap. and then paying premium when you go over.
hmmmm
hmmmmmmmmm
how much do these guys get paid anyway?
"oh the poor defenseless operators, won't be able to rob people blind because our industry is now monitored"
Since probably the phone companies will ban voice-over-IP communication...
Here's what we do: when you want to make a phone call, our software speech-recognises what you say, and texts it tu the intended recipient. At that end, text-to-speech recreates an audible version using the sound of your voice.
Or for the premium price, the sound of a celebrity's voice. Ladies! Have the man in your life sound like George Clooney. Men! Have your special lady sound like Jessica Rabbit.
Or pay -discount- price and you get Elmer Fudd and Bugs Bunny. What ever turns you on.
sigh. voice has been data all along.
From the first day a modem was created that could send arbitrary data over a telecom line, that was the beginning of the end. This is just the natural progression. Expect a huge fight.
4G was finishing testing when they were still trying to negotiate deals to buy the first 3G equipment. 4G could have easily shipped when 3G did. It would have been a wise move for the phone companies, who are perfectly capable of pricing services based on demand and perceived value instead of actual cost (see texting prices for proof). However the few network providers had too many ties to equipment manufacturers, who would have lost a lot of money on 3G if no one bought it.
Welcome to corporatist America, where you're free as long as you can always get government permission. I'm sure they'll find ways to track phone minutes separately from data and rip you off, I mean bill you accordingly.
Voice Quality of current 3G mobiles/networks is pathetic compared to landlines and voice dropouts frequent on any uk mobile network. Perhaps operators can allocate more bandwidth and QOS to voice traffic on 4G.
Also it is waste of limited natural resource(bandwitdh) to remain on 2G and 3G.Earlier we move to 4G, more effiently we can use the spectrum. Seeing how long it has taken to move to 3G in UK, it does not seem the move to 4G will happen anytime soon.
They said the same for 3G.Unless they give it user functional QoS and reduce their already stinking latency then 4G will be just as uselesss for voice as 3G, which already has more than enough bandwidth to carry voice.
seriously,
wtf?
So 4G - you have an iphone / android - are already PAYING for FREE/INCLUDED MINUTES every month. (that now you won't use) < aha they figured that in didn't they.
So you have a choice of using your free minutes or chewing into your very very very unLIMITED cap. and then paying premium when you go over.
hmmmm
hmmmmmmmmm
how much do these guys get paid anyway?
"oh the poor defenseless operators, won't be able to rob people blind because our industry is now monitored"
I'm sure that business models have already taken that into account. Tiered data plans, etc.